Publications

Publications of ECEN and its members (as of December 2016)

 

ECEN initiated papers

Listed chronologically

2016

  1. The particular relevance of clinical ethics support in psychiatry. Concepts, research, and experiences. Molewijk, Bert, Stella Reiter-Theil. Clinical Ethics, 2016, Vol. 11(23), p. 43–44.
  2. Molewijk B, Reiter-Theil S (eds) (2016) Thematic Issue “Clinical Ethics in Psychiatry”. Clinical Ethics 11(2-3):43-44
  3. The European Clinical Ethics Network (ECEN): the professional development of clinical ethics support in Europe and the role of evaluation thereby. Molewijk, B, A Slowther, J Schildmann. Bioethica Forum, 2016, in press.
  4. Hans-Joachim Schwager-prize for clinical ethics for 2016 goes to Bulgaria. Aleksandrova-Yankulovska, S. EACME Newsletter, August 2016, 43:10-12.
  5. Bulgaria with Clinical Ethics Award for 2016. Aleksandrova-Yankulovska, S. (България с награда за клинична етика за 2016 г. Александрова-Янкуловска, С. Социална медицина), Social Medicine, 2016, 1(1): 20-21. [in Bulgarian]

2015

2014

2013

  1. The development of a descriptive evaluation tool for clinical ethics case consultations. Pedersen, R., S. Hurst, J. Schildmann, S. Schuster, B. Molewijk. Clinical Ethics, sept 2010, 5, p. 136-141.
  2. Evaluation of clinical ethics support services and its normativity. Schildmann J, Molewijk B, Benaryo L, Førde R, Neitzke G.. J Med Ethics 2013; 39: 681-5.

2012

  1. Hurst SA : A clinical room with a view. EACME Newsletter. 2012 ;31 :6

2011

  1. Institutional Challenges for Clinical Ethics Committees. Dorries A, Boitte P, Borovecki A, Cobbaut JP, Reiter-Theil S, Slowther AM.. HEC Forum 2011; 23:193-215

2010

  1. Experience in Ethical Decision-making and Attitude of Regional Hospital Physicians toward Ethics Consultation. Aleksandrova, S. In: Clinical Ethics Consultation: Theories & methods – implementation – evaluation. J. Schildmann, J.S. Gordon and J. Vollmann (Eds.). England, Ashgate, 2010, pp. 175-187.
  2. Clinical Ethics Consultation in Croatia. U: Borovečki A, Schildman J, Gordon JS, Vollmann  J  (eds.) Ethikkonsultation heute-vom Modell zur Praxis..Farnham: Ashgate Publishing Limited, 2010. pp. 139-147.
  3. The development of a descriptive evaluation tool for clinical ethics case consultations. Pedersen, R., S. Hurst, J. Schildmann, S. Schuster, B. Molewijk. Clinical Ethics, sept 2010, 5, p. 136-141.
  4. Hurst S.: What ‘Empirical Turn in Bioethics?’ 2010. 24(8), pp 439-44

2009

  1. Fournier V, Rari E, Førde R, Neitzke G, Pegararo R, Newson A. Clinical ethics consultation in Europe: a comparative and ethical review of the role of patients. Clin Ethics 2009; 4:131-8.
  2. Strengths and limitations of considering patients as ethics actors equal to doctors : reflections on the patient’ position in a French clinical ethics consultation setting. RARI E, FOURNIER V. Clinical Ethics. 2009;4:152.
  3. Patient involvement in clinical ethics services: from access to participation and membership. Neitzke G. Clin Ethics. 2009; 4(3):146-151.
  4. The role of patients in European clinical ethics consultation. Newson AJ, Neitzke G, Reiter-Theil S. Clin Ethics. 2009; 4(3):109-110.
  5. Strech D., Borovecki A., Kovacs L. Report on the conference “Clinical ethics consultation: theories and methods- implementation-evaluation”, February 11-15, 2008, Bochum , Germany. Medicine Health Care and Philosophy 2009; 1:109-110.

2008

  1. Strech D., Borovecki A., Kovacs L. Report on the conference “Clinical ethics consultation: theories and methods- implementation-evaluation”, February 11-15, 2008, Bochum , Germany. Medicine Health Care and Philosophy 2009; 1:109-110.

2007

  1. Molewijk, Bert, Guy Widdershoven. Report of the Maastricht meeting of the European Clinical Ethics Network (ECEN). Clinical Ethics, 2007, Vol. 2, nr. 1, p. 45.
  2. Hurst S.: La consultation d’éthique clinique à Genève dans Fournier V., Gaille-Nikodimov M.: L’éthique clinique à l’Hôpital Cochin : une méthode à l’épreuve de l’expérience. Hôpital Cochin. 2007

 

 

Other CES relevant papers by ECEN-members

Listed by author

Aleksandrova, Silviya

  1. Clinical Ethics Consultation. Aleksandrova-Yankulovska, S. Sofia: Bulgarian Cardiological Institute, 2015, p.169 [monograph in Bulgarian]
  2. Approach of Clinical Ethics Consultation in case of Down syndrome. Aleksandrova-Yankulovska, S. , G. Stoyanova. In: European Ethical Standards and Bulgarian Medicine. Sofia, 2014, pp.510-515. (Подход за клинична етична консултация при случай на установен Даун синдром у плода. Александрова-Янкуловска, С., Г. Стоянова. В: Европейските етични стандарти и българската медицина. Сборник статии, София, 2014, с. 510-515.) [in Bulgarian]
  3. The voice of the patient in the focus of clinical ethics consultation. Aleksandrova-Yankulovska, S. (Гласът на пациента във фокуса на клиничната етична консултация. Александрова-Янкуловска С. Обща медицина), General Medicine, 2014, XVI (4):36-43. [in Bulgarian]
  4. New aspects of interest in the area of Clinical Ethics Consultation. Aleksandrova-Yankulovska, S. (Нови аспекти на интерес в областта на клиничната етична консултация. Александрова-Янкуловска С. Обща медицина), General Medicine, 2014, XVI (2):23-29. [in Bulgarian]
  5. French model of Clinical Ethics Consultation – characteristics and examples. (Френски модел на клинична етична консултация – характеристика и примери. Александрова-Янкуловска С. Социална медицина), Social medicine, 2014, XXII (4):43-48. [in Bulgarian]
  6. From lecture hall to hospital bed. Aleksandrova-Yankulovska, S. (От лекционната зала към болничната стая. Александрова-Янкуловска С. ) Challenging The Law, professional legal web-site (ISSN 1314-7854), 13.04.2014. [in Bulgarian]
  7. Approach of clinical ethics consultation in case of surrogacy in the family. Velcheva, P., S. Aleksandrova-Yankulovska. (Подход за клинична етична консултация при случай на сурогатство в семейството.  Велчева, Р., С. Александрова-Янкуловска. ) Challenging The Law, professional legal web-site (ISSN 1314-7854), 23.02.2014. [in Bulgarian]
  8. Experimental treatment on a child. Chalkiadakis, G., S. Aleksandrova-Yankulovska. In: Ethical decision-making in health care. S. Aleksandrova-Yankulovska and H. ten Have (Eds). Pleven, Publishing center of Medical University of Pleven, 2014, pp. 59-65.
  9. Surrogate motherhood counseling. Balasubramaniyem, C., S. Aleksansrova-Yankulovska. In: Ethical decision-making in health care. S. Aleksandrova-Yankulovska and H. ten Have (Eds). Pleven, Publishing center of Medical University of Pleven, 2014, pp. 37-43.
  10. Huntington’s chorea and IVF. Bahar, Z., S. Aleksansrova-Yankulovska. In: Ethical decision-making in health care. S. Aleksandrova-Yankulovska and H. ten Have (Eds). Pleven, Publishing center of Medical University of Pleven, 2014, pp. 33-37.
  11. Infringing patient autonomy. Abbasi, H., S. Aleksandrova-Yankulovska. In: Ethical decision-making in health care. S. Aleksandrova-Yankulovska and H. ten Have (Eds). Pleven, Publishing center of Medical University of Pleven, 2014, pp. 9-15.
  12. Application of Methodology for Ethical Case Analysis to a Case of 62 Year Old First-time Mother. Aleksandrova-Yankulovska, S. Revista Romana de Bioethica, 2014, 2(12):29-36.
  13. Analysis and decision-making in ethics-related cases. Aleksandrova, S. (Анализ и разрешаване на етични казуси. Александрова, С. Сестринско дело), Nursing profession, 2009, 41 (1):34-40. [in Bulgarian]
  14. Survey on the Experience in Ethical Decision-making and Attitude of Pleven University Hospital Physicians Towards Ethics Consultation. Aleksandrova, S. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy. A European Journal, 2008, 11(1):35-42.
  15. Request for abortion without informing the husband. Kaab, A., S. Aleksandrova-Yankulovska. In: Ethical decision-making in health care. S. Aleksandrova-Yankulovska and H. ten Have (Eds). Pleven, Publishing center of Medical University of Pleven, 2014, pp. 19-2

 

Benaroyo, Lazare

  1. Assessing an Adolescent’s Capacity for Autonomous Decision-Making in Clinical Care. Michaud P.A., Blum R.W., Benaroyo L., Zermatten J., Baltag V., 2015. Journal of Adolescent Health : Official Publication of the Society For Adolescent Medicine, 57 (4) pp. 361-366 .
  2. Ethical issues in nutrition support of severely disabled elderly persons: a guide for health professionals. Monod S., Chiolero R., Büla C., Benaroyo L., 2011.  Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, 35 (3) pp. 295-302.
  3. Délibération en éthique clinique, une aide à la décision. Un exemple en hématologie pédiatrique: test génétique (mutation du facteur V Leiden). Jérôme Choudja C. von der Weid N. Beck Popovic M. Benaroyo L. , 2011-03. Paediatrica, 22 (1) pp. 23-25
  4. Ethics and adolescent care: an international perspective. Michaud P.A., Berg-Kelly K., Macfarlane A., Benaroyo L., 2010. Current Opinion In Pediatrics, 22 (4) pp. 418-422
  5. Méthodologie en éthique clinique: une approche intégrant les diverses dimensions éthiques du soin. Benaroyo L., 2004. Médecine et Hygiène, 62 pp. 1304-1307.
  6. Deux visions de la mort ou… deux visions de la vie: jugement pratique en éthique clinique. Mazzocato C., Ducret S., Michel-Nemitz J., Poltier H., Benaroyo L., 2004. Ethique et santé, 1 pp. 182-188.

 

 

Borovekči, Ana

  1. Borovecki A. Makar-Ausperger K., Francetic, I. Babic-Bosanac S., Gordijn B., Steinkamp N., Oreškovic S. Developing a Model of Healthcare Ethics Support in Croatia. Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics 2010; 3: 395-401.
  2. Steinkamp N., Gordijn B., Borovecki A., Gefenas E., Glasa J., Guerrier M., Meulenbergs T., Różyńska J., Slowther A. Regulation of healthcare ethics committees in Europe. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 2007;  4: 461-475.
  3. Borovečki A. Ten Have H. Orešković S. Ethics and the European countries in transition- the past and the future. Med Eth 2006; 214:15-20.
  4. Borovecki A, ten Have H, Oreskovic S. Education of ethics committee members: experiences from Croatia. J Med Ethics. 2006 Mar; 32(3):138-42.
  5. Borovecki A, ten Have H, Oreskovic S. A critical analysis of hospital ethics committees: opportunity or bureaucratic cul-de-sac? Društvena istraživanja 2006; 6:1221-1238
  6. Borovečki A. ten Have H. Orešković S. Ethics Committees in Croatia in the Healthcare Institutions. The First Study about their Structure and Functions, and some Reflections on the Major Issues and Problems. HEC Forum 2006; 1:49-60.
  7. Borovecki A, ten Have H, Oreskovic S. Ethics and the structures of health care in the European countries in transition: hospital ethics committees in Croatia.
    2005 Jul 23; 331(7510):227-9.

Other papers related to the theme of healthcare ethics/clinical ethics

  1. Vucemilo L, Borovecki A. Readability and Content Assessment of Informed Consent Forms for Medical Procedures in Croatia. PLOS One 2015; 10(9):e0138017
  2. Borovevki A. Ethics committees and biobanks- is there a new type of ethics committee emerging in relation to biobanks? U: Caenazzo L. (eds.). New Insights on Biobanks. Padova : Coop. Libraria EditriceUniversity di Padova, 2013. pp. 17-22.
  3. Vucemilo L, Borovecki A. Informed Consent in Croatia. A Work in Progress. Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics 2014; 23: 356-360.
  4. Borovecki A, Caenazzo L, Jezek D, Karija-Vlahovic Monika, Golubic B. Croatian National Centre for Biobanking- a new perspective in biobanks governance? Croatian Medical Journal 2014;55:416-22.
  5. Borovecki A. Features and Functions of Healthcare Ethics in the Croatian Tradition. U: Faitini T, Galvagni L, Nicoletti M (eds.). Etica e professioni sanitarie in Europa. Un dialogo tra medicina e filosofia . Trento : Universita degli studii di Trento, 2014. pp. 89-100.
  6. Luka V, Milosevic M, Babić- Bosanac S. Mustajbegovic J, Borovecki A. Is there a need to improve the informed consent procedures in Croatia- a pilot field survey on a representative sample, a food for thought? Revista Romana de Bioetica 2014; 1: 25-33.
  7. Curkovic M., Milosevic M, Borovecki A, Mustajbegovic J. Physicians’ interpersonal relationships and professional standing seen through the eyes of the general public in Croatia. Patient Preference and Adherence 2014;8: 1135-1142.
  8. Vucemilo L., Curkovic M., Milosevic M., Mustajbegovic J., Borovecki A. Are physician-patient communication practices slowly changing in Croatia?-a cross-sceitional questionnaire study. Croatian Medical Journal 2013; 2:185-9.
  9. Borovecki A., Babić- Bosanac S., ten Have H. Stadiul implementrii legii privind drepiturile pacientilor din Croatia- studio pilot. Revista Romana de Bioetica 2010; 3: 36-48.
  10. Babić- Bosanac S, Borovecki A, Fišter K. Patients’ rights in the Republic of Croatia- between the law and reality. Med glas 2008; 5 (1): 42-8.

 

Fournier, Veronique

  1. The near-failure of advance directives: why they should not be abandoned altogether, but their role radically reconsidered. SPRANZI M, FOURNIER V. Medicine Health Care and Philosophy. 2016 december;19(4):563.
  2. Clinical ethics : Methods. FOURNIER V. Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics. 2015 september;1.
  3. The commitment model  for clinical ethics consultations: society’s involvement in the solution of individual cases. FOURNIER V, SPRANZI M, FOUREUR N, BRUNET L. The Journal of Clinical Ethics. 2015;26(4):286.
  4. Realizing benefit sharing: is there a role for ethics review? SCHROEDER D, GEFENAS E, CHENNELS R, FOURNIER V, FEINHOLZ C, SIRUGO G. Benefit sharing. 2013;179.
  5. Editorial: The french bioethics debate: norms, values and practices. FOURNIER V, SPRANZI M. Medicine Health Care and Philosophy. 2013;16(1):41.
  6. Access to assisted reproductive technologies in France : the emergence of the patients’ voice. FOURNIER V, BERTHIAU D, D’HAUSSY J, BATAILLE P.Medicine Health Care and Philosophy. 2013;16(1):55.
  7. The ethics of living donation for liver transplant : beyond donor autonomy. FOURNIER V, FOUREUR N, RARI E. Medicine Health Care and Philosophy. 2013;16(1):45.
  8. Quelle utilité des directives anticipées pour les médecins? FOURNIER V, BERTHIAU D, KEMPF E, D’HAUSSY J. La Presse Médicale. 2013;42:159.
  9. The balance between beneficence and respect for patient autonomy in clinical medical ethics in France. Special section: international voices. FOURNIER V. Cambridge Quaterly of Healthcare Ethics. Summer 2005;14:281.

 

Førde, Reidun

  1. Magelssen Morten; Førde Reidun; Pedersen Reidar. “Four roles of ethical theory in clinical ethics consultation. American Journal of Bioethics, 2016.
  2. Bahus MK, Førde R. Discussing End-of-Life Decisions in a Clinical Ethics Committee: An Interview Study of Norwegian Doctors’ Experience. HEC Forum. 2016 Feb 29. [Epub ahead of print]
  3. Magelssen M, Pedersen R, Førde R. Novel Paths to Relevance: How Clinical Ethics Committees Promote Ethical Reflection. HEC Forum. 2015 Aug 7. DOI 10.1007.s10730-015-9291-7
  4. Førde R, Linja T. “It scares me to know that we might not have been there!”: a qualitative study into the experiences of parents of seriously ill children participating in ethical case discussions. BMC Med Ethics. 2015 Jun 6;16:40. doi: 10.1186/s12910-015-0028-6.
  5. Førde R, Hansen TWR. Do organization and clinical ethics in a hospital setting need different venues? HEC Forum 2014 Jun;26(2):147-58. doi: 10.1007/s10730-014-9237-5.
  6. Magelssen M, Pedersen R, Førde R. Sources of bias in clinical ethics case deliberation. J Med Ethics 2013, http://jme.bmj.com/content/early/2013/09/18/medethics-2013-101604.full.pdf+html
  7. Førde R, Pedersen R. Clinical ethics committees in Norway: What do they do, and does it make a difference? Cambridge Quaterly of Healthcare Ethics 2011; 20:389-95.
  8. Førde R, Pedersen R. Klinische ethikkonsultation – Ein landesweites Angebot in norwegischen Hostpitälern. I Stutzki, Ralf; Ohnsorge, Kathrin; Reiter-Theil, Stella (red.), Klinische Ethikkonsultation – vom Modell zur Praxis. LIT Verlag, 2010.
  9. Førde R, Hansen RWR. Involving patients and relatives in a Norwegian clinical ethics committee: what have we learned? Clinical Ethics 2009; 4. 121-30.
  10. Pedersen R, Akre V, Førde R. What is happening during case deliberations in clinical ethics committees? A pilot study. J Med Ethics 2009; 35: 147-52.
  11. Pedersen R, Akre V, Førde R. Barriers and challenges in clinical ethics consultations: The experiences of nine clinical ethics committees. Bioethics 2009; Oct;23(8):460-9.
  12. Pedersen R, Førde R. Fuzzy law encountering life, death, and morality – A report on nine clinical ethics committees’ legal considerations. In : Grunnin J, Holm S, Kerway I. Ethics, Law & Society. Ashgate Publishing 2009:149-163.

 

Hurst, Samia A.

  1. Hurst SA: Clarifying vulnerability: the case of children. Asian Bioethics Review. 2015;7(2):126-138
  2. Hurst SA, Becerra M, Perrier A, Junod Perron N, Elger B: Including patients in resuscitation decisions in Switzerland: from doing more to doing better. Journal of Medical Ethics. 2013;39(3):158-65
  3. Hurst S.: Clinical Ethics. In Callahan D., Chadwick R., Singer P.: Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics. Elsevier. 2012
  4. Bourquin V., Lefuel P., Casagne B., Borgniat L., Rastello C., Yamani A., Martin P-Y, Hurst SA: Mise en place de directives anticipées dans un service dialyse chronique : mode d’emploi. Revue Médicale Suisse. 2011 ;7 :2308-11 Hurst S. :
  5. Clinical indication as ethical appraisal : the example of imaging before middle ear surgery. ORL. 2010. 72(3), pp132-43
  6. Strech D., Hurst SA., Danis M.: The role of ethics committees and ethics consultation in allocation decisions. A four-stage process. Medical Care. 2010, 48(9), 821-6
  7. Hurst S., Reiter-Theil S., Slowther A., Pegoraro R., Forde R., Danis M.: Should Ethics Consultants Help Clinicians Face Scarcity in their Practice? Journal of Medical Ethics. 2008, 34(4), pp 241-6.
  8. Hurst S., Reiter-Theil S., Baumann-Hölzle R., Foppa C., Malacrida R., Bosshard G., Salathé M., Mauron A: The Growth of Clinical Ethics in a Multilingual Country: Challenges and Opportunities. Bioethica Forum. 2008. 1(1): pp15-24
  9. Ray S., Hurst S., Perrier A.: Que faire en cas de désaccord entre le médecin et le patient: quelques balises juridiques et éthiques. Revue médicale Suisse. 2008. 180, pp 2538-41
  10. Hurst S., Perrier A., Pegoraro R., Reiter-Theil S., Forde R., Slowther A., Garrett-Mayer E., Danis M.: Ethical difficulties in clinical practice: experiences of European doctors. Journal of Medical Ethics. 2007, 33, pp 51-57
  11. Hurst S., Reiter-Theil S., Perrier A., Forde R., Slowther A., Pegoraro R., Danis M.: Physicians’ Access to Ethics Support Services in Four European Countries. Health Care Analysis. 2007; 15(4):321-35.
  12. Hurst S., Chevrolet J.-C., Loew F.: Methods in Clinical Ethics: a Time for Eclectic Pragmatism? Clinical Ethics. 2006, 1(3), pp 159-64
  13. Hurst S., Mauron M.: Combien d’éthique la médecine supporte-t-elle? Bulletin de l’ASSM. 2006, 4/06, pp1-3
  14. Hurst S., Chandros Hull S., DuVal G., Danis M.: How Physicians Face Ethical Difficulties: A Qualitative Analysis. Journal of Medical Ethics, 2005, 31, pp 7-14
  15. Hurst S., Chandros Hull S., DuVal G., Danis M.: Physicians’ Responses to Resource Constraints. Arch Int Med, 2005, 165(6), pp 639-44
  16. Hurst S.: When Patients Refuse Assessment of Decision-Making Capacity: How Should Clinicians Respond? Arch Int Med , 2004, 164, pp 1757-60

 

 

Neitzke, Gerald

CES cases (clinical ethics) in which ethics support

  1. Klinische Ethikberatung als multiprofessionelle Aufgabe. Neitzke G. Sprache-Stimme-Gehör. 2013; 37(3):136-140.

Methods/structures for CES

  1. Ethikberatung und Ethikkomitees als Instrumente der Entscheidungsunterstützung. Neitzke G. In: Marckmann G (Ed): Praxisbuch Ethik in der Medizin. MWV: Berlin 2015, 23-33.
  2. Klinische Ethikberatung. Neitzke G. In: Sturma D, Heinrichs B (Eds): Handbuch Bioethik. Metzler: Stuttgart 2015, 463-467
  3. Autonomie ermöglichen. Ein Konzept für die Ethikberatung im Gesundheitswesen. Neitzke G. In: Wiesemann C, Simon A (Eds): Patientenautonomie. Theoretische Grundlagen – praktische Anwendungen. Mentis: Münster 2013, 445-455.

Implementation and organisational structure of CES

  1. Klinische Ethikberatung. Ein Praxisbuch für Krankenhäuser und Einrichtungen der Altenpflege. Dörries A, Neitzke G, Simon A, Vollmann J (Eds): Kohlhammer: Stuttgart 2010, 2nd revised edition
  2. Klinische Ethik-Komitees – Ein Sechs-Stufen-Modell zur Institutionalisierung von Ethikberatung. Neitzke G. In: Baumann-Hölzle R, Arn C (Eds): Ethiktransfer in Organisationen. Handbuch Ethik im Gesundheitswesen, Bd. 3. EMH Schwabe: Basel 2009, 133-155.
  3. Formen und Strukturen Klinischer Ethikberatung. Neitzke G. In: Vollmann J, Schildmann J, Simon A (Eds): Klinische Ethik. Aktuelle Entwicklungen in Theorie und Praxis. Campus: Frankfurt 2009, 37-56.

Training

  1. The impact of an ethics training programme on the success of clinical ethics services. Dörries A, Simon A, Vollmann J, Neitzke Clin Ethics. 2014; 9(1):36-44
  2. Implementing clinical ethics in German hospitals: content, didactics and evaluation of a nationwide postgraduate training programme. Dörries A, Simon A, Neitzke G, Vollmann J. J Med Ethics 2010; 36(12):721-726.
  3. Curriculum “Ethikberatung im Krankenhaus”. Simon A, May AT, Neitzke G. Ethik Med. 2005; 17(4):322-326.

Theory of CES

  1. Confidentiality, secrecy, and privacy in ethics consultation. Neitzke G. HEC Forum. 2007; 19(4):293-302.

Evaluation research

  1. Empfehlungen zur Evaluation von Ethikberatung in Einrichtungen des Gesundheitswesens. Neitzke G, Riedel A, Dinges S, Fahr U, May AT. Ethik Med. 2013; 25(2):149-156.
  2. Ethische Konflikte im Klinikalltag – Ergebnisse einer empirischen Studie. Neitzke G. In: Stutzki R, Ohnsorge K, Reiter-Theil S (Eds): Ethikkonsultation heute – vom Modell zur Praxis. Lit-Verlag: Wien 2011, 59-80.

Patient/family participation

  1. Aufgabe und Funktion von Patientenvertretern in der Klinischen Ethikberatung. Neitzke G, Sander K. In: Groß D, May AT, Simon A (Eds): Beiträge zur Klinischen Ethikberatung an Universitätskliniken. Lit-Verlag: Münster 2008, 121-133.

Quality criteria of CES

  1. Empfehlungen zur Erstellung von Ethik-Leitlinien in Einrichtungen des Gesundheitswesens. AG „Ethikberatung im Gesundheitswesen“ in der Akademie für Ethik in der Medizin e.V. (AEM). Neitzke G, Riedel A, Brombacher L, Heinemann W, Herrmann B. Ethik Med. 2015; 27(3): 241-248.

 

Molewijk, Bert

CES cases (clinical ethics) in which ethics support

  1. Inspectors’ ethical challenges in health care regulation: a pilot study. Seekles, W, G Widdershoven, P Robben, G van Dalfsen, B. Molewijk. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 2016, in press.
  2. Two years of moral case deliberations on the use of coercion in mental health care. Which ethical challenges are being discussed by health care professionals? Molewijk, Bert, Ingvild Stokke Engerdahl, Reidar Pedersen. Clinical Ethics, 2016, Vol. 11(2–3), p. 87–96.
  3. (book chapter) Dealing around dilemmas about patients’ wishes to die. Moral case deliberation in a Dutch hospice. A case study.Widdershoven, Guy, Margreet Stolper, Bert Molewijk. In: Patients’ wishes to die. 2015, Edited by: Rehmann-Sutter C, Gudat H, Ohnsorge K. 2015, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  4. Clinical Ethics Committee case 14: How should we transfer a euthanasia request between general practice and a hospital setting? Molewijk Bert, Anneke Lucassen. In: Clinical Ethics, 2011, 6, p. 58-63.
  5. Clinical Ethics Committee Case 13: Should the school doctor contact the mother of a 17-year-old girl who has expressed suicidal thoughts? Molewijk, Bert, Rolf Ahlzen In: Clinical Ethics, 2011, 6, p. 5-10.

Methods/structures for CES

  1. (book chapter) Clinical ethics support. Molewijk, Bert, Anne Slowther, Mark Aulisio. In: Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics (ed. Henk ten Have). Springer Science and Business Media, Dordrecht. Living Reference Work Entry, Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics, p. 1-8, 18 January 2016.
  2. (chapter) Dealing with moral issues in counterterrorism: moral case deliberation as method. Weidema, F, B Molewijk. In: Kowalski, M, The ethics of counterterrorism and the role of counterterrorism professionals. Boom, Amsterdam, 2016, in press
  3. The dilemma method. A conversation method for moral case deliberation. Stolper, Margreet, Guy Widdershoven, Bert MolewijkBMC Medical Ethics, 2016, 17:45.
  4. Emotions and clinical ethics support. A moral inquiry into emotions in moral case deliberation. Molewijk, Bert, Dick Kleinlugtenbelt, Scott Pugh, Guy Widdershoven. In: HEC Forum, Volume 23, Issue 4 (2011), Page 257-268.
  5. The role of emotions in moral case deliberation. Theory, practice and methodology. Molewijk, Bert, Dick Kleinlugtenbelt, Guy Widdershoven. In: Bioethics, 2011, Sep;25(7):383-93.
  6. (book chapter) Clinical Ethics in the Netherlands: Moral Case Deliberation in Health Care Organizations. Margreet Stolper, Sandra van der Dam, Guy Widdershoven, Bert Molewijk. In: Schildmann, Gordon, Vollmann (eds.), Clinical Ethics Consultation. Theories and Methods, Implementation, Evaluation. Ashgate, 2010, p.149-160.
  7. Teaching ethics in the clinic: The theory and practice of moral case deliberation. Molewijk AC, Abma T, Stolper M, Widdershoven G. J Med Ethics, 2008, 34, 120 -124.

Implementation and organisational structure of CES

  1. Working towards implementing moral case deliberation in mental healthcare. Ongoing dialogue and shared ownership as strategy. Weidema, Froukje, Hans van Dartel, Bert Molewijk. Clinical Ethics, 2016, Vol. 11(2–3)
  2. Enacting Ethics. Bottom-up involvement in implementing moral case deliberation. Weidema, F., B. Molewijk, G. Widdershoven, T. Abma. In: Health Care Analysis, 2012, 20, p. 1-19.
  3. Moral Case Deliberation in an Academic Hospital in the Netherlands. Tensions Between Theory and Practice. Stolper, Margreet, Suzanne Metselaar, Bert Molewijk, Guy Widdershoven. In: Journal International de Bioéthique, 2012, Sep-Dec;23(3-4): 53-66.
  4. Organizing Moral Case Deliberation in mixed groups: experiences in two Dutch nursing homes. Dam, S. van der, T.A. Abma, A.C. Molewijk, M.J.M. Kardol, J.M.G.A Schols, G.A.M. Widdershoven. In Nursing Ethics, 2011, May;18(3):327-40.
  5. Implementing moral case deliberation in a psychiatric hospital: process and outcome. Molewijk B, Verkerk M, Milius H, Widdershoven G In: Med Health Care and Philosophy, 2008, 11, 43-56.
  6. Implementing moral case deliberation in Dutch health care: improving moral competency of professionals and quality of care. Molewijk B, Zadelhoff E, Lendemeijer B, Widdershoven G. In: Bioethica Forum, 2008. 1, 1, 57-65.

Training

  1. Social work students dealing with moral dilemmas in the care for children and young people: an evaluation of moral case deliberation as an educational tool. Spijkerboer R.P., J. C. van der Stel, G. A. M. Widdershoven & A. C. Molewijk. Social Work Education, 2016, DOI: 10.1080/02615479.2016.120146
  2. Training facilitators of Moral Case Deliberation: a successful experience with involving external health care professionals in the sessions and in feedback to the trainees. Pasman-de Roo, K, M Stolper, G Widdershoven, B Molewijk. Bioethica Forum, 2016, in press.
  3. Learning by doing. Training health care professionals to become facilitators of moral case deliberation. Stolper, Margreet, Bert Molewijk, Guy Widdershoven. HEC Forum, 2015 Mar;27(1):47-59. doi: 10.1007/s10730-014-9251-7.
  4. Moral dilemmas in a military context. A case study of a trainer the trainer course in military ethics. Baarle, Eva van, Jolanda Bosch, Guy Widdershoven, Desiree Verweij, Bert Molewijk. Journal of Moral Education, 2015, Vol. 44, Issue 4, p.457-478.
  5. Training healthcare professionals as moral case deliberation facilitators: evaluation of a Dutch training programme. Plantinga, Mirjam, Bert Molewijk, Menno de Bree, Marloes Moraal, Marian Verkerk, Guy A M Widdershoven. In: Journal Medical Ethics (2012), Oct;38 (10): 630-5p.

Theory of CES

  1. Ethical Theory as Part of Clinical Ethics Support Practice. Widdershoven, Guy, S. Metselaar, B. Molewijk. The American Journal of Bioethics, 2016, Vol.16, Issue 9; p34-36.
  2. Beyond recommendation and meditation: moral case deliberation as moral learning in dialogue. Metselaar, Suzanne, Bert Molewijk, Guy Widdershoven. Am J Bioeth, 2015, 15(1):50-1.
  3. The practical importance of theory in clinical ethics support services. Molewijk, Bert, Anne Slowther, Mark Aulisio. In: Bioethics. Sep; 2011, 25(7):ii-iii
  4. (book chapter) Philosophical Foundations of Clinical Ethics: A Hermeneutic Perspective. Guy Widdershoven, Bert Molewijk. In: Schildmann, Gordon, Vollmann (eds.), Clinical Ethics Consultation. Theories and Methods, Implementation, Evaluation. Ashgate, 2010, p.37-51.
  5. Good care in ongoing dialogue. Improving the quality of care through moral deliberation and responsive evaluation. Abma, T., Molewijk, B., Widdershoven, G.A.M. Health Care Analysis, 2009, Volume 17, Issue 3, p. 217-235.

Evaluation research

  1. Evaluation of Moral Case Deliberation at The Dutch Health Care Inspectorate: A Pilot Study. Seekles, W, G Widdershoven, P Robben, G van Dalfsen, B. BMC Medical Ethics, 2016, in press.
  2. Does moral case deliberation help professionals in care for the homeless in dealing with their dilemmas? A mixed-methods responsive study. Spijkerboer, R, G Widdershoven, J van der Stel, A.C. Molewijk. HEC Forum, Published on line 17 August 2016, DOI 10.1007/s10730-016-9310-3.
  3. Social work students dealing with moral dilemmas in the care for children and young people: an evaluation of moral case deliberation as an educational tool. Spijkerboer R.P., J. C. van der Stel, G. A. M. Widdershoven & A. C. Molewijk. Social Work Education, 2016, DOI: 10.1080/02615479.2016.120146
  4. Evaluation and perceived results of moral case deliberation in a Dutch organization for elderly care. A quantitative and qualitative study. Janssens, Rien, Ezra van Zadelhoff, Ger van Loo, Guy Widdershoven, Bert Molewijk. Nursing Ethics, Dec;22(8):870-80.
  5. Managers’ views on and experiences with moral case deliberation in nursing teams. Weidema, Frouk, Bert Molewijk, Frans Kamsteeg, Guy Widdershoven. Journal of Nursing Management, Volume 23, Issue 8, pages 1067–1075, November 2015.
  6. Evaluating clinical ethics support in mental health care. A systematic literature review. Hem, Marit Helene, Reidar Pedersen, Reidun Norvoll, Bert Molewijk. Nursing Ethics, 2015, Jun;22(4):452-66.
  7. Outcomes of Moral Case Deliberation. The development of an evaluation instrument for clinical ethics support (the Euro-MCD). Svantesson M, Karlsson J, Boitte P, Schildmann J, Dauwerse L, Widdershoven G, Huisman M, Pedersen R, Molewijk B. BMC Medical Ethics, 2014, 15: 30.
  8. Ethics support in elderly care: a review of the literature. Dam, Sandra van der, Bert Molewijk, Guy Widdershoven, Tineke Abma. In: J Med Ethics, 2014 Sep;40(9):625-631.
  9. Prevalence and characteristics of moral case deliberation in Dutch health care. Dauwerse, Linda, Margreet Stolper, Guy Widdershoven, Bert Molewijk. In: Med Health Care Philos, 2014, Aug, 17 (3), 365-75.
  10. Implicit and explicit clinical ethics support in The Netherlands: a mixed-methods overview study. Dauwerse, Linda, Frouk Weidema, Tine Abma, Bert Molewijk, Guy Widdershoven. In: HEC Forum, 2014, Jun 26(2), 95-106.
  11. Evaluation of clinical ethics support services and its normativity. Schildmann, Jan, Bert Molewijk, Lazare Benaroyo, Reidun Førde, Gerald Neitzke. In: Journal of Medical Ethics, 2013 Nov, 39(11), 681-5.
  12. Goals of Clinical Ethics Support. Perceptions of Dutch Health Care Institutions. Dauwerse, Linda, Tineke Abma, Bert Molewijk, Guy Widdershoven. In: Health Care Analysis, Dec 2013, 21(4), 323-37.
  13. The Discovery of Deliberation. From reluctance to appreciation through the learning process of doing Moral Case Deliberation in Dutch elderly care. Dam, Sandra van der, Jos Schols, Tinie Kardol, Bert Molewijk, Guy Widdershoven, Tineke Abma. In: Social Science & Medicine, 2013, April, 83, p. 125-32.
  14. Aims and harvest of moral case deliberation. Weidema, Frouk, Bert Molewijk, Frans Kamsteeg, Guy Widdershoven. In: Nursing Ethics, 2013, Sep, 20(6), 617-31.
  15. Need for ethics support in healthcare institutions: views of Dutch board members and ethics support staff. Dauwerse, Linda, Tineke Abma, Bert Molewijk, Guy Widdershoven. In: Journal of Medical Ethics, 2011, Aug;37(8):456-60.

Patient/family participation

  1. Client participation in moral case deliberation: deliberating in a precarious relational balance. Weidema, Frouk, Tineke Abma, Guy Widdershoven, Bert Molewijk. In: HEC Forum 2011 Sep;23(3):207-24

 

Quality criteria of CES

  1. (book chapter) Peer review and beyond. Towards a dialogical approach of quality of ethics support. Widdershoven, Guy, Bert Molewijk, Suzanne Metselaar . In: Finder S & Bliton M (eds), The case of Zadeh. Peer review in ethics consultation. Springer, 2016, in press.
  2. What quality is actually assessed within written records? Molewijk B, G Widdershoven, J Vollmann, J Schildmann. The American Journal of Bioethics, 2016, Vol.16, Issue 9; p. 34-36.
  3. Measuring the quality of the deliberation in moral case deliberations: A coding scheme. Jellema, Hylke, S, Kremer S, AR Mackor, B Molewijk. Bioethics, 2016, in press.
  4. Fostering the Ethics of Ethics Consultants in Health Care: An Ongoing Participatory Approach. Molewijk, Bert, Laura Hartmann, Froukje Weidema, Yolande Voskes, Guy Widdershoven. American Journal of Bioethics; 2015, 15(5):60-2.

 

Pedersen, Reidar

  1. Lillemoen, Lillian; Syse, Irene; Pedersen, Reidar; Førde, Reidun. Er kliniske etikk-komiteer i den kommunale helse- og omsorgstjenesten bærekraftige?[Are ethics committees in municipal health care services sustainable?] Etikk i praksis 2016 (2) s. 127-140
  2. Magelssen, Morten; Gjerberg, Elisabeth; Lillemoen, Lillian; Førde, Reidun; Pedersen, Reidar. Ethics support in community care makes a difference for practice. Nursing Ethics 2016 [in press]
  3. Magelssen, Morten; Pedersen, Reidar; Førde, Reidun. Four Roles of Ethical Theory in Clinical Ethics Consultation. American Journal of Bioethics 2016 ;Volum 16.(9) s. 26-33
  4. Molewijk, Albert Christiaan; Engerdahl, Ingvild Stokke; Pedersen, Reidar. Two years of moral case deliberations on the use of coercion in mental health care: Which ethical challenges are being discussed by health care professionals? Clinical Ethics 2016
  5. Syse, Irene; Førde, Reidun; Pedersen, Reidar. Clinical ethics committees – also for mental health care? The Norwegian experience. Clinical Ethics 2016
  6. Molewijk, Albert Christiaan; Hem, Marit Helene; Pedersen, Reidar. Dealing with ethical challenges: A focus group study with professionals in mental health care. BMC Medical Ethics 2015 ;Volum 16.(1)
  7. Hem, Marit Helene; Pedersen, Reidar; Norvoll, Reidun; Molewijk, Albert Christiaan. Evaluating clinical ethics support in mental healthcare: A systematic literature review. Nursing Ethics 2015 ;Volum 22.(4) s. 452-466
  8. Lillemoen, Lillian; Pedersen, Reidar. Ethics reflection groups in community health services: an evaluation study. BMC Medical Ethics 2015 ;Volum 16.(25)
  9. Magelssen, Morten; Pedersen, Reidar; Førde, Reidun. Novel Paths to Relevance: How Clinical Ethics Committees Promote Ethical Reflection. HEC Forum 2015
  10. Magelssen, Morten; Pedersen, Reidar; Førde, Reidun. Sources of bias in clinical ethics case deliberation. Journal of Medical Ethics 2014 ;Volum 40.(10) s. 678-682
  11. Svantesson, Mia; Karlsson, Jan; Boitte, Pierre; Schildman, Jan; Dauwerse, Linda; Widdershoven, Guy; Pedersen, Reidar; Huisman, Martijn; Molewijk, Albert Christiaan. Outcomes of Moral Case Deliberation – The development of an evaluation instrument for clinical ethics support (the Euro-MCD). BMC Medical Ethics 2014 ;Volum 15.(1)
  12. Gjerberg, Elisabeth; Lillemoen, Lillian; Dreyer, Anne; Pedersen, Reidar; Førde, Reidun. Etisk kompetanseheving i norske kommuner-hva er gjort, og hva har vært levedyktig over tid? [Ethics work in Norwegian municipalities] Etikk i praksis 2014 ;Volum 8.(2) s. 31-49
  13. Lillemoen, Lillian; Pedersen, Reidar. Ethical challenges and how to develop ethics support in primary health care. Nursing Ethics 2013 ;Volum 20.(1) s. 96-108
  14. Lillemoen, Lillian; Pedersen, Reidar. Ethics in Municipal Health Services – Working Systematically with Ethics and Developing Competence in Ethics. Clinical Ethics 2013 ;Volum 8.(1) s. 19-28
  15. Førde, Reidun; Pedersen, Reidar. Evaluation of case consultations in clinical ethics committees. Clinical Ethics 2012 ;Volum 7.(1) s. 45-50
  16. Førde, Reidun; Pedersen, Reidar. Clinical ethics committees in Norway – what do they do, and does it make a difference? Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2011 ;Volum 20.(3) s. 389-395
  17. Førde, Reidun; Pedersen, Reidar. Klinische Ethikkonsultation – ein landesweites Angebot in norwegischen Hospitälern. I: Ethikkonsultation heute – vom Modell zur Praxis. LIT Verlag 2011 ISBN 978-3-03735-131-4. s. 303-315
  18. Kalager, Guro; Førde, Reidun; Pedersen, Reidar. Er drøftingen av pasientsaker i kliniske etikk-komiteer nyttig? [Are deliberations of patient cases in clinical ethics committees useful?] Tidsskrift for Den norske legeforening 2011 ;Volum 131. s. 118-121
  19. Pedersen, Reidar; Akre, Victoria; Førde, Reidun. BARRIERS AND CHALLENGES IN CLINICAL ETHICS CONSULTATIONS: THE EXPERIENCES OF NINE CLINICAL ETHICS COMMITTEES. Bioethics 2009 ;Volum 23.(8) s. 460-469
  20. Pedersen, Reidar; Akre, Victoria; Førde, Reidun. What is happening during case deliberations in clinical ethics committees? A pilot study. Journal of Medical Ethics 2009 ;Volum 35.(4) s. 147-152
  21. Pedersen, Reidar; Førde, Reidun. Fuzzy Law Encountering Life, Death, and Morality: A Report on Nine Clinical Ethics Committees’ Legal Considerations. I: Ethics, Law and Society Volume IV. Ashgate 2009 ISBN 978-0-7546-7646-1. s. 149-163
  22. Bollig, Georg; Pedersen, Reidar; Førde, Reidun. Etikk i sykehjem og hjemmetjenester. [Ethics in nursing homes and home care services] Sykepleien Forskning 2009 ;Volum 4.(03) s. 186-196
  23. Førde, Reidun; Pedersen, Reidar; Akre, Victoria. Clinicians’ evaluation of clinical ethics consultations in Norway: a qualitative study. Medicine, Health care and Philosophy 2008 ;Volum 11. s. 17-25
  24. Pedersen, Reidar; Førde, Reidun. Hva gjør de kliniske etikkomiteene? [What are the clinical ethics comittees doing?] Tidsskrift for Den norske legeforening 2005 ;Volum 125.(22) s. 3127-3129

 

 

 Reiter-Theil, Stella

  1. Reiter-Theil S (2016) Initiating and Maintaining Clinical Ethics Support in Psychiatry. Ten Tasks and Challenges – and How to Meet Them. Clinical Ethics 11(2-3):45-53
  2. Meyer D, Reiter-Theil S (2016) Context-adjusted clinical ethics support (CES) in psychiatry. Accompanying a team through a sensitive period. Clinical Ethics 11(2-3): 70-80
  3. Reiter-Theil S, Schürmann J (2016) The ‘Big Five’ in 100 Clinical Ethics Consultation Cases. Evaluating three years of ethics support in the Basel University Hospitals. Bioethica Forum 9(2): 12-22
  4. Reiter-Theil S, Schürmann J (2016) Unterstützung bei ethischen Fragen – eine methodische Orientierung zur Ethikberatung in der Palliativversorgung. In: Wienke A, Janke K, Sitte T, Graf-Baumann T (Hrsg) Aktuelle Rechtsfragen der Palliativversorgung. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, S. 35-47
  5. Reiter-Theil S, Schürmann J (2016/accepted) Evaluating clinical ethics support: on what grounds do we make judgments about reports of ethics consultation? In: Finder S (ed)
  6. Reiter-Theil S, Schürmann J, Schmeck K (2014) Klinische Ethik in der Psychiatrie: State of the Art. Psychiat Praxis 41(07): 355-363
  7. Rabenschlag F, Steinauer R, Heimann R, Reiter-Theil S (2014) Wahrnehmung ethischer Aspekte in der psychiatrischen Patientenverso Ergebnisse einer Mitarbeiterumfrage. Psychiatrische Praxis 41(07): 376-378
  8. Stutzki R, Weber M, Reiter-Theil S (2013) Finding their voices again – A media project offers a floor for vulnerable patients, clients and the socially deprived. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy. Med Health Care Philos 16(4): 739-750
  9. Medau I, Jox R, Reiter-Theil S (2013) Error management in psychotherapy in the light of ethical principles. An interview study. BMC Medical Ethics 14(1): 50
  10. Medau I, Jox R, Dittmann V, Reiter-Theil S (2012) Eine Pilotstudie zum Umgang mit Fehlern in der Psychotherapie – Therapeuten berichten aus der Praxis. Psychiat Prax 39: 326-331
  11. Reiter-Theil S, Mertz M, Schürmann J, Stingelin-Giles N, Meyer-Zehnder B (2011) Evidence – Competence – Discourse. The Theoretical Framework of the Multi-centre Clinical Ethics Support Project METAP. Bioethics 25(7): 403-412
  12. Hurst SA, Reiter-Theil S, Slowther A, Pegoraro R, Foerde R, Danis M (2011) Soll Ethikkonsultation Ärzten beim Umgang mit Ressourcen helfen? In: Stutzki R, Ohnsorge K, Reiter-Theil S (Hrsg) Ethikkonsultation heute – vom Modell zur Praxis, S. 281-300
  13. Reiter-Theil S (2011) Das Ausbalancieren der Perspektiven oder: (Wie) Kann und soll man Patienten und Angehörige in die Ethikberatung einbeziehen? In: Stutzki R, Ohnsorge K, Reiter-Theil S (Hrsg) Ethikkonsultation heute – vom Modell zur Praxis, S. 169-184
  14. Reiter-Theil S (2011) Normativ-ethische Reflexion von Rollen und Tätigkeiten in der Ethikberatung – ein integratives Modell. In: Stutzki R, Ohnsorge K, Reiter-Theil S (Hrsg) Ethikkonsultation heute – vom Modell zur Praxis, S. 119-130
  15. Stutzki R, Ohnsorge K, Reiter-Theil S (Hrsg) (2011) Ethikkonsultation heute – vom Modell zur Praxis. LIT Verlag, Münster
  16. Reiter-Theil S (2009) Dealing with the normative dimension in clinical ethics consultation. Cambridge Quarterly Healthcare Ethics 18(4): 347-346
  17. Pfäfflin M, Kobert K, Reiter-Theil S (2009) Evaluating Clinical Ethics Consultation. Cambridge Quarterly Healthcare Ethics 18(4): 406-419
  18. Reiter-Theil S (2009) Hilfe in ethischen Entscheidungskonflikten: Basiswissen zur Ethikberatung in der Klinik. In: Salomon F (Hrsg) Praxisbuch Ethik in der Intensivmedizin. Medizinisch Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft, S. 41-50
  19. Hurst S, Reiter-Theil S, Slowther A, Pegoraro R, Forde R, Danis M (2008) Should ethics consultants help clinicians face scarcity of resources? Journal of Medical Ethics 34: 241-246
  20. Hurst S, Reiter-Theil S, Baumann-Hölzle R, Foppa C, Malacrida R, Bosshard G, Salathé M, Mauron A (2008) Growth of clinical ethics in a multilingual country: challenges and opportunities. Bioethica Forum 1, 1: 15-24
  21. Kobert K, Pfäfflin M, Reiter-Theil S (2008) Evaluation des klinischen Ethik-Beratungsdienstes. Hintergrund, Konzepte und Strategie im Ev. Krankenhaus Bielefeld. Ethik Med 20: 122-133
  22. Reiter-Theil S (2008) Ethikberatung in der Klinik: ein integratives Modell für die Praxis und ihre Reflexion. Therapeutische Umschau 65: 359-365
  23. Hurst S, Reiter-Theil S, Slowther A, Pegoraro R, Forde R, Danis M (2007) Physicians’ access to ethics support services in four European countries. Health Care Analysis 15, 4: 321-335
  24. Reiter-Theil S (2006) Klinische Ethikkonsultation: Grundlagen zur Einführung einer interdisziplinären Form der Beratung. In: Riha O, Nartschik C, Helm S (Hrsg) Schriftenreihe des Instituts für Ethik in der Medizin Leipzig e.V., Shaker Verlag, Aachen, Band 8, S. 38-59
  25. Bartels S, Parker M, Hope T, Reiter-Theil S (2005) Wie hilfreich sind “ethische Richtlinien” am Einzelfall? Eine vergleichende kasuistische Analyse der Deutschen Grundsätze, Britischen Guidelines und Schweizerischen Richtlinien zur Sterbebegleitung. Ethik Med 17, 3; 191-205
  26. Reiter-Theil S (2005) Klinische Ethikkonsultation – eine methodische Orientierung zur ethischen Beratung am Krankenbett. Schweizerische Ärztezeitung 86, 6: 436-351
  27. Reiter-Theil S (2003) Balancing the Perspectives. The Patient’s Role in Clinical Ethics Consultation. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 6: 247-254
  28. Reiter-Theil S (2001) The Freiburg approach of ethics consultation. Process, outcome and competencies. Journal of Medical Ethics 27, suppl I: 121-123
  29. Reiter-Theil S (2001) Ethics consultation in Germany. The present situation. Health Ethics Committee Forum 13 (3): 265-280
  30. Reiter-Theil S (2000) Ethics consultation on demand. Concepts, practical experiences and a case study. Journal of Medical Ethics 26: 198-203
  31. Reiter-Theil S (1999) Ethik in der Klinik – Theorie für die Praxis: Ziele, Aufgaben und Möglichkeiten des Ethik-Konsils. Ethik Med 11, 4: 222-232
  32. Reiter-Theil S (1999) The Role of Ethics Codes in Medicine: How Can They be Helpful in Making Decisions? In: Hildt E, Graumann S (eds) Genetics in Human Reproduction, Ashgate, Aldershot, p. 299-310
  33. Reiter-Theil S (1999) Anwendung ethischer Prinzipien bei der Begutachtung am Beispiel der Lebendspende. In: Dierks C, Neuhaus P, Wienke A (Hrsg) Die Allokation von Spenderorganen. Rechtliche Aspekte. Schriftenreihe Medizinrecht, Springer, Heidelberg, S. 23-34
  34. Reiter-Theil S (1998) Kompetenz durch Ethik-Konsultation: ein Modell – dargestellt am Problem der Sterilisation einer geistig behinderten Frau. Systeme 12: 1-15
  35. Höger C, Reiter-Theil S, Reiter L, Derichs G, Kastner-Voigt M, Schulz T (1997) Fallbezogene ethische Reflexion. Ein Prozessmodell zur Ethik-Konsultation in der Kin derpsychiatrie und Psychotherapie. System Familie 10: 174-179

 

Edition of Thematic Issues

  1. Reiter-Theil S, Dittmann V (Hrsg) (2014) Themenschwerpunkt „Ethische Unterstützung in der Psychiatrischen Klinik: Fragestellungen – Konzepte – Erfahrungen.“ Psychiatrische Praxis 41(7)
  2. Agich GJ, Reiter-Theil S (eds) (2009) Special Issue “Clinical Ethics Consultation”. Cambridge Quarterly of Health Care Ethics 18(4)
  3. Reiter-Theil S, Agich GJ (eds) (2008) Thematic Section “Research on Clinical Ethics and Consultation”. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 11, 1
  4. Reiter-Theil S, Illhardt FJ (1999) Ethik-Beratung in der Medizin. Ethik Med 11, 4

 

Schildmann Jan

Books

  1. Schildmann J, Gordon JS, Vollmann J (eds): Clinical Ethics Consultation. Theories and Methods, Implementation, Evaluation. Ashgate, Farnham 2010
  2. Vollmann J, Schildmann J, Simon A (eds): Klinische Ethik. Aktuelle Entwicklungen in Theorie und Praxis. Campus, Frankfurt/Main 2009

Articles

  1. Schildmann J, Nadolny S, Wäscher S, Gysels M, Vollmann J, Bausewein C: Clinical ethics support services (CESS) as complex intervention. Preliminary findings of a conceptual analysis and possible implications for outcomes research. Bioethica Forum 9,2:90-92 (2016)
  2.  Molewijk B, Slowther A, Schildmann J: The European Clinical Ethics Network (ECEN): the professional development of clinical ethics support in Europe and the importance of quality assessment through evaluation research Bioethica Forum 9:86-89 (2016)
  3. Schildmann J, Vollmann J: Evaluation of clinical ethics consultation: A systematic review and critical appraisal of research methods and outcome criteria. In: Schildmann J, Gordon J, Vollmann J (Eds): Clinical Ethics Consultation: theories – methods – evaluation. Ashgate Publishers, Farnham 2010 pp. 203-215

Spranzi, Marta

Clinical ethics consultation

  1. “Professionalizing the practice of clinical ethics consultation: Problems and perspectives”, Bioethica Forum, 9(2), 2016, 31-33
  2. (With Véronique Fournier, Laurence Brunet and Nicolas Foureur) “The ‘commitment model’ for clinical ethics consultations : society’s involvement in the solution of individual cases”, The Journal of Clinical Ethics, 2015, 26(4), 286-296.

Clinical ethics

  1. « When patients’ values challenge professional integrity » (to be published in : Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 2017)
  2. (With Véronique Fournier, Elisabeth Belghiti and Laurence Brunet), « Controversies surrounding WANH in NICU in France » (to be published in : Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 2017)
  3. « La place des parents dans la décision de limitation, d’arrêt ou de poursuite des traitements actifs en néonatologie », dans : P. Bétrémieux (dir.), La démarche palliative en médecine périnatale, Olo Editions (to be published, 2017).
  4. « Professional integrity »,  Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics, édité par Henk ten Have, Springer, 2016.
  5. (With Véronique Fournier), “The near-failure of advance directives: why they should not be abandoned altogether, but their role radically reconsidered”, Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 2016, 19(4), 563-568.
  6. « The French euthanasia debate : Exception and solidarity », The Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 2013, 22, 1-9.
  7. “Clinical ethics and values : how do norms evolve from practice ?” The Journal of Medicine, Healthcare and Philosophy, 2013, 16(1), 93-103.
  8. “The normative relevance of cases: Rhetoric and empirical ethics”, The Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 2012, vol. 21(4), 481-492.
  9. (With Véronique Fournier) « L’autonomie en question: pratique éthique et enjeux politiques », Raison publique, automne 2011, vol. 5, 217-242.

 

Vollmann, Jochen

 

Books

  1. Dörries A, Neitzke G, Simon A, Vollmann J (eds): Klinische Ethikberatung. Ein Praxisbuch für Krankenhäuser und Einrichtungen der Altenpflege.2., überarbeitete und erweiterte Auflage. Kohlhammer, Stuttgart 2010
  2. Schildmann J, Gordon JS, Vollmann J (eds): Clinical Ethics Consultation. Theories and Methods, Implementation, Evaluation. Ashgate, Farnham 2010
  3. Vollmann J, Schildmann J, Simon A (eds): Klinische Ethik. Aktuelle Entwicklungen in Theorie und Praxis. Campus, Frankfurt/Main 2009

Articles

  1. Schildmann J, Nadolny S, Wäscher S, Gysels M, Vollmann J, Bausewein C: Clinical ethics support services (CESS) as complex intervention. Preliminary findings of a conceptual analysis and possible implications for outcomes research. Bioethica Forum 2,90-92 (2016)
  2. Gather J, Vollmann J: Klinische Ethikberatung – ein Modell für die Psychiatrie? Psyche im Fokus 1,38-40 (2015)
  3. Dörries A, Simon A, Vollmann J Neitzke G: The impact of an ethics training programme on the success of clinical ethics services. Clinical Ethics 9,36-44 (2014)
  4. Vollmann J: The implementation process of clinical ethics consultation: concepts, resistance, recommendations. Revista Română de Bioetică, 11 (3), 108-122 (2013)
  5. Dörries A, Neitzke G, Simon A, Vollmann J: Implementing Clinical Ethics in German Hospitals: Content, Didactics and Evaluation of a Nationwide Postgraduate Training Programme. Journal of Medical Ethics 36, 721-726 (2010)
  6. Vollmann J: Klinik: Aufgaben und Kriterien für Klinische Ethikkomitees. Bundesgesundheitsblatt 51; 865-871 (2008)
  7. Vollmann J: Klinische Ethikkomitees und Ethikberatung in Deutschland: Bisherige Entwicklung und zukünftige Perspektiven. Bioethica Forum 1(1), 33-39 (2008)
  8. Vollmann J: Klinische Ethikkomitees und klinische Ethikberatung im Krankenhaus. Ein Praxisleitfaden über Strukturen, Aufgaben, Modelle und Implementierungsschritte. Medizinethische Materialien Bochum 164, 9ed. (2007)
  9. Vollmann J: Ethik in der klinischen Medizin. Bestandsaufnahme und Ausblick. Ethik in der Medizin 18, 348-352 (2006)
  10. Wernstedt T, Vollmann J: Das Erlanger klinische Ethikkomitee. Organisationsethik an einem deutschen Universitätsklinikum. Ethik in der Medizin 17, 44-51 (2005)
  11. Vollmann J: Klinische Ethikkomitees und Ethikberatung in Deutschland. Zeitschrift für Palliativmedizin 6, 2-5 (2005)
  12. Dörries A, Simon A, Neitzke G, Vollmann J: Ethikberatung im Krankenhaus: Qualifizierungsprogramm Hannover. Ethik in der Medizin 17, 327-331 (2005)
  13. Vollmann J, Wank M, Weidtmann A, Reinhardt FM: What did she “really” want? (Kasuistik) Intensive Care Medicine 30, 733 (2004)
  14. Vollmann J, Burchardi N, Weidtmann A: Klinische Ethikkomitees an deutschen Universitätskliniken. Eine Befragung aller Ärztlichen Direktoren und Pflegedirektoren. Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift 129, 1237-1242 (2004)
  15. Vollmann J: Implementing clinical ethics in health care institutions: The Nijmegen model. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 7, 223-225 (2004)
  16. Vollmann J, Weidtmann A: Das Klinische Ethikkomitee des Erlanger Universitätsklinikums: Institutionalisierung-Arbeitsweise-Perspektiven. Ethik in der Medizin 15, 229-238 (2003)
  17. Vollmann J: Effekte klinischer Ethikberatung auf amerikanischen Intensivstationen. (Kommentar) Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift 128, 2409 (2003)
  18. Vollmann J: Ethikberatung. Ist die Ethikberatung im amerikanischen Krankenhaus ein Modell für Deutschland? Zeitschrift für Allgemeinmedizin 73, 137-138 (1997)
  19. Vollmann J: Der klinische Ethiker – ein Konzept mit Zukunft? Zur Integration von philosophischer Ethik in die praktische Medizin. Ethik in der Medizin 7, 181-192 (1995)