Publications

Publications of ECEN and its members (as of October 2018)

 

ECEN initiated papers

Listed chronologically

2016

  1. Molewijk B, Reiter-Theil S: The particular relevance of clinical ethics support in psychiatry. Concepts, research, and experiences. Clinical Ethics 11,23:43–44 (2016).
  2. Molewijk B, Reiter-Theil S: Thematic Issue “Clinical Ethics in Psychiatry”. Clinical Ethics 11,2-3:43-44 (2016).
  3. Molewijk, B, Slowther A, Schildmann J: The European Clinical Ethics Network (ECEN): the professional development of clinical ethics support in Europe and the role of evaluation thereby. Bioethica Forum 9,2:86–89 (2016).
  4. Aleksandrova-Yankulovska S: Hans-Joachim Schwager-prize for clinical ethics for 2016 goes to Bulgaria. EACME Newsletter, 43:10-12 (2016).
  5. Aleksandrova-Yankulovska, S: Bulgaria with Clinical Ethics Award for 2016. (България с награда за клинична етика за 2016 г. Александрова-Янкуловска, С. Социална медицина), Social Medicine, 1,1 20-21 (2016). [in Bulgarian]

 

2015

 

2014

  1. Svantesson M, Karlsson J, Boitte P, Schildman J, Dauwerse L, Widdershoven G, Pedersen R, Huisman M, Molewijk B: Outcomes of Moral Case Deliberation – the development of an evaluation instrument for clinical ethics support (the Euro-MCD). BMC Medical Ethics 8,15:30 (2014).

 

2013

  1. Schildmann J, Molewijk B, Benaryo L, Førde R, Neitzke G: Evaluation of clinical ethics support services and its normativity. J Med Ethics 39:681-5 (2013).

 

2012

  1. Hurst SA: A clinical room with a view. EACME Newsletter 31:6 (2012).

 

2011

  1. Dorries A, Boitte P, Borovecki A, Cobbaut JP, Reiter-Theil S, Slowther AM: Institutional Challenges for Clinical Ethics Committees. HEC Forum 23:193-215 (2011).

 

2010

  1. Aleksandrova, S: Experience in Ethical Decision-making and Attitude of Regional Hospital Physicians toward Ethics Consultation. In: J. Schildmann, J.S. Gordon and J. Vollmann (Eds): Clinical Ethics Consultation: Theories & methods – implementation – evaluation. England, Ashgate 2010 pp. 175-187.
  2. Borovečki A: Clinical Ethics Consultation in Croatia. In: Schildman J, Gordon JS, Vollmann J (Eds): Ethikkonsultation heute – vom Modell zur Praxis. Ashgate Publishing Limited, Farnham 2010. pp. 139-147.
  3. Pedersen R, Hurst S, Schildmann J, Schuster S, Molewijk B: The development of a descriptive evaluation tool for clinical ethics case consultations. Clinical Ethics 5:136-141 (2010).
  4. Hurst S: What ‘Empirical Turn in Bioethics?’. Bioethics 24,8:439-44 (2010).

 

2009

  1. Fournier V, Rari E, Førde R, Neitzke G, Pegararo R, Newson A: Clinical ethics consultation in Europe: a comparative and ethical review of the role of patients. Clin Ethics 4:131-8 (2009).
  2. Rari E, Fournier V: Strengths and limitations of considering patients as ethics actors equal to doctors: reflections on the patient’ position in a French clinical ethics consultation setting. Clinical Ethics 4:152 (2009).
  3. Neitzke G: Patient involvement in clinical ethics services: from access to participation and membership. Clin Ethics 4,3:146-151 (2009).
  4. Newson AJ, Neitzke G, Reiter-Theil S: The role of patients in European clinical ethics consultation. Clin Ethics 4,3:109-110 (2009).
  5. Strech D, Borovecki A, Kovacs L: Report on the conference “Clinical ethics consultation: theories and methods – implementation – evaluation”, February 11-15, 2008, Bochum , Germany. Medicine Health Care and Philosophy 1:109-110 (2009).

 

2008

  1. Strech D., Borovecki A., Kovacs L. Report on the conference “Clinical ethics consultation: theories and methods- implementation-evaluation”, February 11-15, 2008, Bochum , Germany. Medicine Health Care and Philosophy 1:109-110 (2009).

 

2007

  1. Molewijk B, Widdershoven G: Report of the Maastricht meeting of the European Clinical Ethics Network (ECEN). Clinical Ethics 2,1:45 (2007).
  2. Hurst .: La consultation d’éthique clinique à Genève. In: Fournier V, Gaille-Nikodimov M (Eds.): L’éthique clinique à l’Hôpital Cochin: une méthode à l’épreuve de l’expérience. Hôpital Cochin 2007.

 

 

Other CES relevant papers by ECEN-members

Listed by author

 

Aleksandrova, Silviya

  1. Aleksandrova-Yankulovska S (Eds.): Clinical Ethics Consultation. Bulgarian Cardiological Institute 2015 p.169 [monograph in Bulgarian]
  2. Aleksandrova-Yankulovska, S. , G. Stoyanova: Approach of Clinical Ethics Consultation in case of Down syndrome. In: Marinova E, Popova S (Eds): European Ethical Standards and Bulgarian Medicine. Sofia 2014 pp.510-515. (Подход за клинична етична консултация при случай на установен Даун синдром у плода. Александрова-Янкуловска, С., Г. Стоянова. В: Европейските етични стандарти и българската медицина. Сборник статии, София, 2014, с. 510-515.) [in Bulgarian]
  3. Aleksandrova-Yankulovska S: The voice of the patient in the focus of clinical ethics consultation. (Гласът на пациента във фокуса на клиничната етична консултация. Александрова-Янкуловска С. Обща медицина). General Medicine 16,4:36-43 (2014). [in Bulgarian]
  4. Aleksandrova-Yankulovska S: New aspects of interest in the area of Clinical Ethics Consultation. (Нови аспекти на интерес в областта на клиничната етична консултация. Александрова-Янкуловска С. Обща медицина), General Medicine 16;2:23-29 (2014). [in Bulgarian]
  5. Aleksandrova-Yankulovska S: French model of Clinical Ethics Consultation – characteristics and examples. (Френски модел на клинична етична консултация – характеристика и примери. Александрова-Янкуловска С. Социална медицина), Social medicine 22,4:43-48 (2014). [in Bulgarian]
  6. Aleksandrova-Yankulovska S: From lecture hall to hospital bed.  (От лекционната зала към болничната стая. Александрова-Янкуловска С.) Challenging The Law, professional legal web-site (ISSN 1314-7854), 13.04.2014. [in Bulgarian]
  7. Velcheva P, Aleksandrova-Yankulovska S: Approach of clinical ethics consultation in case of surrogacy in the family. (Подход за клинична етична консултация при случай на сурогатство в семейството.  Велчева, Р., С. Александрова-Янкуловска.) Challenging The Law, professional legal web-site (ISSN 1314-7854), 23.02.2014. [in Bulgarian]
  8. Chalkiadakis G, Aleksandrova-Yankulovska S: Experimental treatment on a child. In: Aleksandrova-Yankulovska S, ten Have H (Eds): Ethical decision-making in health care. Pleven, Publishing center of Medical University of Pleven 2014 pp. 59-65.
  9. Balasubramaniyem C, Aleksansrova-Yankulovska S: Surrogate motherhood counseling.. In: Aleksandrova-Yankulovska S, ten Have H (Eds): Ethical decision-making in health care. Pleven, Publishing center of Medical University of Pleven 2014 pp. 37-43.
  10. Bahar Z, Aleksansrova-Yankulovska S: Huntington’s chorea and IVF. In: Aleksandrova-Yankulovska S, ten Have H (Eds): Ethical decision-making in health care. Pleven, Publishing center of Medical University of Pleven 2014 pp. 33-37.
  11. Abbasi H, Aleksandrova-Yankulovska S: Infringing patient autonomy. In: Aleksandrova-Yankulovska S, ten Have H (Eds):  Ethical decision-making in health care. Pleven, Publishing center of Medical University of Pleven 2014 pp. 9-15.
  12. Aleksandrova-Yankulovska S: Application of Methodology for Ethical Case Analysis to a Case of 62 Year Old First-time Mother. Revista Romana de Bioethica 2,12:29-36 (2014).
  13. Aleksandrova S: Analysis and decision-making in ethics-related cases. (Анализ и разрешаване на етични казуси. Александрова, С. Сестринско дело). Nursing profession 41,1:34-40 (2009). [in Bulgarian]
  14. Aleksandrova S: Survey on the Experience in Ethical Decision-making and Attitude of Pleven University Hospital Physicians Towards Ethics Consultation. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy. A European Journal 11,1:35-42 (2008).
  15. Kaab A, Aleksandrova-Yankulovska S: Request for abortion without informing the husband.. In: Aleksandrova-Yankulovska S, ten Have H (Eds): Ethical decision-making in health care. Pleven, Publishing center of Medical University of Pleven 2014 pp. 19-2

 

 

Benaroyo, Lazare

  1. Michaud PA, Blum RW, Benaroyo L, Zermatten J, Baltag V: Assessing an Adolescent’s Capacity for Autonomous Decision-Making in Clinical Care. Journal of Adolescent Health: Official Publication of the Society For Adolescent Medicine 57,4:361-366 (2015).
  2. Monod S, Chiolero R, Büla C, Benaroyo L: Ethical issues in nutrition support of severely disabled elderly persons: a guide for health professionals. Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, 35,3:295-302 (2011).
  3. Jérôme Choudja C, von der Weid N, Beck Popovic M, Benaroyo L: Délibération en éthique clinique, une aide à la décision. Un exemple en hématologie pédiatrique: test génétique (mutation du facteur V Leiden). Paediatrica 22,1:23-25 (2011).
  4. Michaud PA, Berg-Kelly K, Macfarlane A, Benaroyo L: Ethics and adolescent care: an international perspective. Current Opinion In Pediatrics, 22,4:418-422 (2010).
  5. Benaroyo L: Méthodologie en éthique clinique: une approche intégrant les diverses dimensions éthiques du soin. Médecine et Hygiène 62:1304-1307 (2004).
  6. Mazzocato C, Ducret S, Michel-Nemitz J, Poltier H, Benaroyo L: Deux visions de la mort ou… deux visions de la vie: jugement pratique en éthique clinique. Ethique et santé, 1:182-188 (2004).

 

 

Borovekči, Ana

  1. Borovecki A, Makar-Ausperger K, Francetic I, Babic-Bosanac S, Gordijn B, Steinkamp N, Oreškovic S: Developing a Model of Healthcare Ethics Support in Croatia. Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics 3:395-401 (2010).
  2. Steinkamp N, Gordijn B, Borovecki A, Gefenas E, Glasa J, Guerrier M, Meulenbergs T, Różyńska J, Slowther A: Regulation of healthcare ethics committees in Europe. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 4: 461-475 (2007).
  3. Borovečki A, Ten Have H, Orešković S: Ethics and the European countries in transition- the past and the future. Med Eth 214:15-20 (2006).
  4. Borovecki A, ten Have H, Oreskovic S: Education of ethics committee members: experiences from Croatia. J Med Ethics 32(3):138-42 (2006).
  5. Borovecki A, ten Have H, Oreskovic S: A critical analysis of hospital ethics committees: opportunity or bureaucratic cul-de-sac? Društvena istraživanja 6:1221-1238 (2006).
  6. Borovečki A, ten Have H, Orešković S: Ethics Committees in Croatia in the Healthcare Institutions. The First Study about their Structure and Functions, and some Reflections on the Major Issues and Problems. HEC Forum 1:49-60 (2006).
  7. Borovecki A, ten Have H, Oreskovic S: Ethics and the structures of health care in the European countries in transition: hospital ethics committees in Croatia. BMC 23,331(7510):227-9 (2005).

Other papers related to the theme of healthcare ethics/clinical ethics

  1. Vucemilo L, Borovecki A: Readability and Content Assessment of Informed Consent Forms for Medical Procedures in Croatia. PLOS One  10,9:e0138017 (2015).
  2. Borovevki A: Ethics committees and biobanks- is there a new type of ethics committee emerging in relation to biobanks? In: Caenazzo L. (Eds): New Insights on Biobanks. Padova: Coop. Libraria EditriceUniversity di Padova 2013 pp. 17-22.
  3. Vucemilo L, Borovecki A: Informed Consent in Croatia. A Work in Progress. Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics 23:356-360 (2014).
  4. Borovecki A, Caenazzo L, Jezek D, Karija-Vlahovic M, Golubic B: Croatian National Centre for Biobanking- a new perspective in biobanks governance? Croatian Medical Journal 55:416-22 (2014).
  5. Borovecki A: Features and Functions of Healthcare Ethics in the Croatian Tradition. In: Faitini T, Galvagni L, Nicoletti M (Eds): Etica e professioni sanitarie in Europa. Un dialogo tra medicina e filosofia. Trento: Universita degli studii di Trento 2014 pp. 89-100.
  6. Luka V, Milosevic M, Babić- Bosanac S. Mustajbegovic J, Borovecki A: Is there a need to improve the informed consent procedures in Croatia- a pilot field survey on a representative sample, a food for thought? Revista Romana de Bioetica 1: 25-33 (2014).
  7. Curkovic M., Milosevic M, Borovecki A, Mustajbegovic J: Physicians’ interpersonal relationships and professional standing seen through the eyes of the general public in Croatia. Patient Preference and Adherence 8: 1135-1142 (2014).
  8. Vucemilo L, Curkovic M, Milosevic M, Mustajbegovic J, Borovecki A: Are physician-patient communication practices slowly changing in Croatia?-a cross-sceitional questionnaire study. Croatian Medical Journal 2:185-9 (2013).
  9. Borovecki A, Babić- Bosanac S, ten Have H: Stadiul implementrii legii privind drepiturile pacientilor din Croatia- studio pilot. Revista Romana de Bioetica 3: 36-48 (2010).
  10. Babić- Bosanac S, Borovecki A, Fišter K: Patients’ rights in the Republic of Croatia- between the law and reality. Med glas 5,1: 42-8 (2008).

 

 

Fournier, Veronique

  1. Spranzi M, Fournier V: The near-failure of advance directives: why they should not be abandoned altogether, but their role radically reconsidered. Medicine Health Care and Philosophy 19(4):563 (2016).
  2. Fournier V: Clinical ethics: Methods. Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics 2015.
  3. Fournier V, Spranzi M, Foureur N, Brunet L: The commitment model for clinical ethics consultations: society’s involvement in the solution of individual cases. The Journal of Clinical Ethics 26,4:286 (2015).
  4. Schroeder D, Gefenas E, Chiennels R, Fournier V, Feinholz C, Sirugo G: Realizing benefit sharing: is there a role for ethics review? Benefit sharing 179 (2013).
  5. Fournier V, Spranzi M: Editorial: The french bioethics debate: norms, values and practices. Medicine Health Care and Philosophy 16,1:41 (2013).
  6. Fournier V, Berthiau D, D’Haussy J, Bataille P: Access to assisted reproductive technologies in France : the emergence of the patients’ voice. Medicine Health Care and Philosophy 16,1:55 (2013).
  7. Fournier V, Foureur N, Rari E: The ethics of living donation for liver transplant : beyond donor autonomy. Medicine Health Care and Philosophy 16,1:45 (2013).
  8. Fournier V, Berthiau D, Kempf E, D’Haussy J: Quelle utilité des directives anticipées pour les médecins? La Presse Médicale 42:159 (2013).
  9. Fournier V: The balance between beneficence and respect for patient autonomy in clinical medical ethics in France. Special section: international voices. Cambridge Quaterly of Healthcare Ethics 14:281 (2005).

 

 

Førde, Reidun

  1. Magelssen M, Førde R, Pedersen R: “Four roles of ethical theory in clinical ethics consultation. American Journal of Bioethics 16,9:26-33 (2016).
  2. Bahus MK, Førde R: Discussing End-of-Life Decisions in a Clinical Ethics Committee: An Interview Study of Norwegian Doctors’ Experience. HEC Forum (2016). [Epub ahead of print]
  3. Magelssen M, Pedersen R, Førde R: Novel Paths to Relevance: How Clinical Ethics Committees Promote Ethical Reflection. HEC Forum (2015).
  4. Førde R, Linja T: “It scares me to know that we might not have been there!”: a qualitative study into the experiences of parents of seriously ill children participating in ethical case discussions. BMC Med Ethics 6,16:40 (2015).
  5. Førde R, Hansen TWR: Do organization and clinical ethics in a hospital setting need different venues? HEC 26,2:147-58 (2014).
  6. Magelssen M, Pedersen R, Førde R: Sources of bias in clinical ethics case deliberation. J Med Ethics 40,10:678-82 (2013).
  7. Førde R, Pedersen R: Clinical ethics committees in Norway: What do they do, and does it make a difference? Cambridge Quaterly of Healthcare Ethics 20:389-95 (2011).
  8. Førde R, Pedersen R: Klinische Ethikkonsultation – Ein landesweites Angebot in norwegischen Hostpitälern. In: Stutzki R, Ohnsorge K, Reiter-Theil S (Eds): Klinische Ethikkonsultation – vom Modell zur Praxis. LIT Verlag, 2010.
  9. Førde R, Hansen RWR: Involving patients and relatives in a Norwegian clinical ethics committee: what have we learned? Clinical Ethics 4:121-30 (2009).
  10. Pedersen R, Akre V, Førde R: What is happening during case deliberations in clinical ethics committees? A pilot study. J Med Ethics 35:147-52 (2009).
  11. Pedersen R, Akre V, Førde R: Barriers and challenges in clinical ethics consultations: The experiences of nine clinical ethics committees. Bioethics 23,8:460-9 (2009).
  12. Pedersen R, Førde R: Fuzzy law encountering life, death, and morality – A report on nine clinical ethics committees’ legal considerations. In: Grunnin J, Holm S, Kerway I (Eds): Ethics, Law & Society. Ashgate Publishing 149-163 (2009).

 

 

Hurst, Samia A.

  1. Hurst SA: Clarifying vulnerability: the case of children. Asian Bioethics Review 7,2:126-138 (2015).
  2. Hurst SA, Becerra M, Perrier A, Junod Perron N, Elger B: Including patients in resuscitation decisions in Switzerland: from doing more to doing better. Journal of Medical Ethics 39,3:158-65 (2013).
  3. Hurst S: Clinical Ethics. In: Callahan D, Chadwick R, Singer P (Eds): Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics. Elsevier 2012.
  4. Bourquin V, Lefuel P, Casagne B, Borgniat L, Rastello C, Yamani A, Martin P-Y, Hurst SA: Mise en place de directives anticipées dans un service dialyse chronique: mode d’emploi. Revue Médicale Suisse 7:2308-11  (2011).
  5. Hurt SA: Clinical indication as ethical appraisal: the example of imaging before middle ear surgery. ORL 72,3:132-43 (2010).
  6. Strech D, Hurst SA, Danis M: The role of ethics committees and ethics consultation in allocation decisions. A four-stage process. Medical Care 48,9:821-6 (2010).
  7. Hurst S, Reiter-Theil S, Slowther A, Pegoraro R, Forde R, Danis M: Should Ethics Consultants Help Clinicians Face Scarcity in their Practice? Journal of Medical Ethics 34,4:241-6 (2008).
  8. Hurst S, Reiter-Theil S, Baumann-Hölzle R, Foppa C, Malacrida R, Bosshard G, Salathé M, Mauron A: The Growth of Clinical Ethics in a Multilingual Country: Challenges and Opportunities. Bioethica Forum 1,1:15-24 (2008).
  9. Ray S, Hurst S, Perrier A: Que faire en cas de désaccord entre le médecin et le patient: quelques balises juridiques et éthiques. Revue médicale Suisse 180:2538-41(2008).
  10. Hurst S, Perrier A, Pegoraro R, Reiter-Theil S, Forde R, Slowther A, Garrett-Mayer E, Danis M.: Ethical difficulties in clinical practice: experiences of European doctors. Journal of Medical Ethics 33:51-57 (2007).
  11. Hurst S, Reiter-Theil S, Perrier A, Forde R, Slowther A, Pegoraro R, Danis M: Physicians’ Access to Ethics Support Services in Four European Countries. Health Care Analysis 15,4:321-35 (2007).
  12. Hurst S, Chevrolet JC, Loew F: Methods in Clinical Ethics: a Time for Eclectic Pragmatism? Clinical Ethics 1,3:159-64 (2006).
  13. Hurst S, Mauron M: Combien d’éthique la médecine supporte-t-elle? Bulletin de l’ASSM 4,6:1-3 (2006).
  14. Hurst S, Chandros Hull S, DuVal G, Danis M: How Physicians Face Ethical Difficulties: A Qualitative Analysis. Journal of Medical Ethics 31:7-14 (2005).
  15. Hurst S, Chandros Hull S, DuVal G, Danis M: Physicians’ Responses to Resource Constraints. Arch Int Med 165,6:639-44 (2005).
  16. Hurst S: When Patients Refuse Assessment of Decision-Making Capacity: How Should Clinicians Respond? Arch Int Med 164:1757-60 (2004).

 

 

Molewijk, Bert

CES cases (clinical ethics) in which ethics Support

  1. Tan DYB, ter Meulen BC, Molewijk B, Widdershoven G: Moral case Deliberation. Practical Neurology 18,3:181-186 (2018).
  2. Seekles W, Widdershoven G, Robben P, van Dalfsen G, Molewijk B: Inspectors’ ethical challenges in health care regulation: a pilot study. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 20,3:311-320 (2017).
  3. Molewijk B, Engerdahl IS, Pedersen R: Two years of moral case deliberations on the use of coercion in mental health care. Which ethical challenges are being discussed by health care professionals? Clinical Ethics 11,2–3:87–96 (2016).
  4. Widdershoven G, Stolper M, Molewijk B: Dealing around dilemmas about patients’ wishes to die. Moral case deliberation in a Dutch hospice. A case study. In: Rehmann-Sutter C, Gudat H, Ohnsorge K: Patients’ wishes to die. Oxford, Oxford University Press 2015.
  5. Molewijk B, Lucassen A: Clinical Ethics Committee case 14: How should we transfer a euthanasia request between general practice and a hospital setting? Clinical Ethics 6:58-63 (2011).
  6. Molewijk B, Ahlzen R: Clinical Ethics Committee Case 13: Should the school doctor contact the mother of a 17-year-old girl who has expressed suicidal thoughts? Clinical Ethics 6:5-10 (2011).

Methods/structures for CES

  1. Hartman LA, Metselaar S, Molewijk B, Edelbroek H, Widdershoven G: Developing an ethics Support tool for dealing with dilemmas around client autonomy based on Moral case deliberations. BMC Medical Ethics 19:97 (2018)
  2. Weidema F, Molewijk B: Dealing with moral issues in counterterrorism: moral case deliberation as method. In: Kowalski M (Ed): The ethics of counterterrorism and the role of count
  3. erterrorism professionals. Boom, Amsterdam 2016.
  4. Molewijk B, Slowther A, Aulisio M: Clinical ethics support. In: ten Have H (Ed): Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics. Springer Science and Business Media, Dordrecht. Living Reference Work Entry, Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics 2016 pp. 1-8.
  5. Stolper M, Widdershoven G, Molewijk B: The dilemma method. A conversation method for moral case deliberation. BMC Medical Ethics 17:45 (2017).
  6. Molewijk B, Kleinlugtenbelt D, Pugh S, Widdershoven G: Emotions and clinical ethics support. A moral inquiry into emotions in moral case deliberation. HEC Forum 23,4:257-268 (2011).
  7. Molewijk B, Kleinlugtenbelt D, Widdershoven G: The role of emotions in moral case deliberation. Theory, practice and methodology. Bioethics 25,7:383-93 (2011).
  8. Stolper M, van der Dam S, Widdershoven G, Molewijk B: Clinical Ethics in the Netherlands: Moral Case Deliberation in Health Care Organizations. In: Schildmann J, Gordon JS, Vollmann J (Eds.): Clinical Ethics Consultation. Theories and Methods, Implementation, Evaluation. Ashgate, Farnham 2010 pp.149-160.
  9. Molewijk AC, Abma T, Stolper M, Widdershoven G: Teaching ethics in the clinic: The theory and practice of moral case deliberation. J Med Ethics 34:120 -124 (2008).

Implementation and organisational structure of CES

  1. Weidema F, van Dartel H, Molewijk B: Working towards implementing moral case deliberation in mental healthcare. Ongoing dialogue and shared ownership as strategy. Clinical Ethics 11:2–3 (2016).
  2. Weidema, F, Molewijk B, Widdershoven G, Abma T: Enacting Ethics. Bottom-up involvement in implementing moral case deliberation. Health Care Analysis 20:1-19 (2012).
  3. Stolper Ma, Metselaar S, Molewijk B, Widdershoven G: Moral Case Deliberation in an Academic Hospital in the Netherlands. Tensions Between Theory and Practice. Journal International de Bioéthique 23,3-4:53-66 (2012).
  4. van der Dam S, Abma TA, Molewijk B, Kardol MJM, Schols JMGA, Widdershoven GAM: Organizing Moral Case Deliberation in mixed groups: experiences in two Dutch nursing homes. Nursing Ethics 18,3:327-40 (2011).
  5. Molewijk B, Verkerk M, Milius H, Widdershoven G: Implementing moral case deliberation in a psychiatric hospital: process and outcome. Med Health Care and Philosophy 11,43-56 (2008).
  6. Molewijk B, Zadelhoff E, Lendemeijer B, Widdershoven G: Implementing moral case deliberation in Dutch health care: improving moral competency of professionals and quality of care. Bioethica Forum 1,1:57-65 (2008).

Training

  1. van Baarle E, van de Braak I, Verweij D, Widdershoven G, Molewijk B: The safety paradox in ethics Training. A case study on safety dynamics within a military ethics train-the-trainer course. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 22,3 (2018).
  2. van Baarle E, Hartman L, Verweij D, Molewijk B, Widdershoven G: What Sticks? The Evaluation of a Train-the-trainer course in military ethics and ist perceived Outcomes. Journal of Military Ethics 16,1-2 (2017).
  3. Spijkerboer RP, van der Stel JC, Widdershoven GAM, Molewijk AC: Social work students dealing with moral dilemmas in the care for children and young people: an evaluation of moral case deliberation as an educational tool. Social Work Education 35,7:794-808 (2016).
  4. Pasman-de Roo K, Stolper M, Widdershoven G, Molewijk B: Training facilitators of Moral Case Deliberation: a successful experience with involving external health care professionals in the sessions and in feedback to the trainees. Bioethica Forum [in press].
  5. Stolper M, Molewijk B, Widdershoven G: Learning by doing. Training health care professionals to become facilitators of moral case deliberation. HEC Forum 27,1:47-59 (2015).
  6. Van Baarle E, Bosch J, Widdershoven G, Verweij D, Molewijk B: Moral dilemmas in a military context. A case study of a trainer the trainer course in military ethics. Journal of Moral Education 44,4:457-478 (2015).
  7. Plantinga M, Molewijk B, de Bree M, Moraal M, Verkerk M, Widdershoven GAM: Training healthcare professionals as moral case deliberation facilitators: evaluation of a Dutch training programme. Journal Medical Ethics 38,10:630-635 (2012).

Theory of CES

  1. Jellema H, Kremer S, Mackor AR, Molewijk B: Evaluating the Quality of the Deliberation in Moral case deliberations: A Coding Scheme. Bioethics 31,4:277-285 (2017).
  2. Widdershoven G, Metselaar S, Molewijk B: Ethical Theory as Part of Clinical Ethics Support Practice. The American Journal of Bioethics 16,9:34-36 (2016).
  3. Metselaar S, Molewijk B, Widdershoven G: Beyond recommendation and meditation: moral case deliberation as moral learning in dialogue. Am J Bioeth 15,1:50-1 (2015).
  4. Molewijk B, Slowther A, Aulisio M: The practical importance of theory in clinical ethics support services. Bioethics 25,7:ii-iii (2011).
  5. Widdershoven G, Molewijk B: Philosophical Foundations of Clinical Ethics: A Hermeneutic Perspective. In: Schildmann J, Gordon JS, Vollmann J (Eds): Clinical Ethics Consultation. Theories and Methods, Implementation, Evaluation. Ashgate Publichers, Farnham 2010 pp.37-51.
  6. Abma T, Molewijk B, Widdershoven GAM: Good care in ongoing dialogue. Improving the quality of care through moral deliberation and responsive evaluation. Health Care Analysis17,3:217-235 (2009).

Evaluation Research

  1. Svantesson M, de Snoo-Trimp JC, Ursin G, Brinchmann BS, De Vet H, Molewijk B: Important outcomes of Moral Case Deliberation. A Euro-MCD field survey of healthcare professionals’ priorities. Journal of Medical Ethics, in press (2019).
  2. Hem MH, Molewijk B, Gjerberg E, Lillemoen L, Pedersen R: The significance of ethics reflection Groups in mental health care: a focus group study among health care professionals. BMC Medical Ethics 19,1:54 (2018).
  3. de Snoo-Trimp J, Molewijk B., de Vet R: Defining and categorizing Outcomes of Moral Case Deliberation: concept mapping with experienced MCD participants. BMC Medical Ethics 19,1:88 (2018).
  4. Bartholdson C, Molewijk B, Lützén K, Blomgren K, Pergert P: Ethis case reflection sessions: Enablers and barriers. Nursing Ethics 25,2:199-211 (2018).
  5. de Snoo-Trimp J, Widdershoven G, Svantesson M, de Vet R, Molewijk B: What Outcomes do Durch Healthcare Professionals perceive as important before participation in Moral Case Deliberation? Bioethics 31,4:246-257 (2017).
  6. Molewijk B, Schildmann J, Slowther A: Evaluation of Clinical Ethics Support Services: Theory, methodology & results. Bioethics 31,4:234-236 (2017).
  7. Metselaar S, Widdershoven G, Porz R, Molewijk B: Evaluating Clinical Ethics Support: A Participatory Approach. Bioethics 31,4:258-226 (2017).
  8. Seekles W, Widdershoven G, Robben P, van Dalfsen G, Molewijk B: Evaluation of Moral Case Deliberation at The Dutch Health Care Inspectorate: A Pilot Study. BMC Medical Ethics 17;1:31 (2016).
  9. Spijkerboer R, Widdershoven G, van der Stel J, Molewijk AC: Does moral case deliberation help professionals in care for the homeless in dealing with their dilemmas? A mixed-methods responsive study. HEC Forum 29;1:21-41 (2016).
  10. Spijkerboer RP, van der Stel JC, Widdershoven GAM, Molewijk AC: Social work students dealing with moral dilemmas in the care for children and young people: an evaluation of moral case deliberation as an educational tool. Social Work Education 35,7:794-808 (2016).
  11. Janssens R, van Zadelhoff E, van Loo G, Widdershoven G, Molewijk B: Evaluation and perceived results of moral case deliberation in a Dutch organization for elderly care. A quantitative and qualitative study. Nursing Ethics 22,8:870-80 (2014).
  12. Weidema F, Molewijk B, Kamsteeg, Widdershoven G: Managers’ views on and experiences with moral case deliberation in nursing teams. Journal of Nursing Management 23,8:1067–1075 (2015).
  13. Hem MH, Pedersen R, Norvoll R, Molewijk B: Evaluating clinical ethics support in mental health care. A systematic literature review. Nursing Ethics 22,4:452-66 (2015).
  14. Svantesson M, Karlsson J, Boitte P, Schildmann J, Dauwerse L, Widdershoven G, Huisman M, Pedersen R, Molewijk B: Outcomes of Moral Case Deliberation. The development of an evaluation instrument for clinical ethics support (the Euro-MCD). BMC Medical Ethics 15:30 (2014).
  15. Van der Dam S, Molewijk B, Widdershoven G, Abma T: Ethics support in elderly care: a review of the literature. J Med Ethics 40;9:625-631 (2014).
  16. Dauwerse L, Stolper M, Widdershoven G, Molewijk B: Prevalence and characteristics of moral case deliberation in Dutch health care. Med Health Care Philos 17,3:365-75 (2014).
  17. Dauwerse L, Weidema F, Abma T, Molewijk B, Widdershoven G: Implicit and explicit clinical ethics support in The Netherlands: a mixed-methods overview study. HEC Forum 26,2:95-106 (2014).
  18. Schildmann J, Molewijk B, Benaroyo L, Førde R, Neitzke G: Evaluation of clinical ethics support services and its normativity. Journal of Medical Ethics 39,11:681-685 (2013).
  19. Dauwerse L, Abma T, Molewijk B, Widdershoven G: Goals of Clinical Ethics Support. Perceptions of Dutch Health Care Institutions. Health Care Analysis 21,4:323-337 (2013).
  20. van der Dam S, Schols J, Kardol T, Molewijk B, Widdershoven G, Abma T: The Discovery of Deliberation. From reluctance to appreciation through the learning process of doing Moral Case Deliberation in Dutch elderly care. Social Science & Medicine 83:125-32 (2013).
  21. Weidema F, Molewijk B, Kamsteeg F, Widdershoven G: Aims and harvest of moral case deliberation. Nursing Ethics 20,6:617-631 (2013).
  22. Dauwerse L, Abma T, Molewijk B, Widdershoven G: Need for ethics support in healthcare institutions: views of Dutch board members and ethics support staff. Journal of Medical Ethics 37,8:456-60 (2011).

Patient/family participation

  1. Weidema F, Abma T, Widdershoven G, Molewijk B: Client participation in moral case deliberation: deliberating in a precarious relational balance. HEC Forum 23,3:207-24 (2011).

Quality criteria of CES

  1. Widdershoven G, Molewijk B, Metselaar S: Peer review and beyond. Towards a dialogical approach of quality of ethics support. In: Finder S, Bliton M, Mark J (Eds): Peer review, Peer Education, and Modeling in the Practice of Clinical Ethics Consultation: The Zadeh Project. Springer 2018 pp. 193-203.
  2. Molewijk B, Widdershoven G, Vollmann J, Schildmann J: What quality is actually assessed within written records? The American Journal of Bioethics 16,9:34-36 (2016).
  3. Jellema H, Kremer S, Mackor AR, Molewijk B: Evaluating the quality of the deliberation in moral case deliberations: A coding scheme. Bioethics 31:277-285 (2017).
  4. Molewijk B, Hartmann L, Weidema F, Voskes Y, Widdershoven G: Fostering the Ethics of Ethics Consultants in Health Care: An Ongoing Participatory Approach. American Journal of Bioethics 15,5:60-2 (2015).

 

 

Neitzke, Gerald

CES cases (clinical ethics) in which ethics support

  1. Neitzke G: Klinische Ethikberatung als multiprofessionelle Aufgabe. Sprache-Stimme-Gehör 37,3:136-140 (2013).

Methods/structures for CES

  1. Neitzke G: Ethikberatung und Ethikkomitees als Instrumente der Entscheidungsunterstützung. In: Marckmann G (Ed): Praxisbuch Ethik in der Medizin. MWV: Berlin 2015 pp.23-33.
  2. Neitzke G: Klinische Ethikberatung. In: Sturma D, Heinrichs B (Eds): Handbuch Bioethik. Metzler, Stuttgart 2015 pp.463-467.
  3. Neitzke G: Autonomie ermöglichen. Ein Konzept für die Ethikberatung im Gesundheitswesen. In: Wiesemann C, Simon A (Eds): Patientenautonomie. Theoretische Grundlagen – praktische Anwendungen. Mentis, Münster 2013 pp. 445-455.

Implementation and organisational structure of CES

  1. Dörries A, Neitzke G, Simon A, Vollmann J (Eds): Klinische Ethikberatung. Ein Praxisbuch für Krankenhäuser und Einrichtungen der Altenpflege. Kohlhammer, Stuttgart 2010, 2nd revised edition.
  2. Neitzke G: Klinische Ethik-Komitees – Ein Sechs-Stufen-Modell zur Institutionalisierung von Ethikberatung. In: Baumann-Hölzle R, Arn C (Eds): Ethiktransfer in Organisationen. Handbuch Ethik im Gesundheitswesen, Bd. 3. EMH Schwabe, Basel 2009 pp.133-155.
  3. Neitzke G: Formen und Strukturen Klinischer Ethikberatung. In: Vollmann J, Schildmann J, Simon A (Eds): Klinische Ethik. Aktuelle Entwicklungen in Theorie und Praxis. Campus, Frankfurt 2009 pp.37-56.

Training

  1. Dörries A, Simon A, Vollmann J, Neitzke G: The impact of an ethics training programme on the success of clinical ethics services. Clin Ethics 9,1:36-44 (2014).
  2. Dörries A, Simon A, Neitzke G, Vollmann J: Implementing clinical ethics in German hospitals: content, didactics and evaluation of a nationwide postgraduate training programme. J Med Ethics 36,12:721-726 (2010).
  3. Simon A, May AT, Neitzke G: Curriculum “Ethikberatung im Krankenhaus”. Ethik Med 17,4:322-326 (2005).

Theory of CES

  1. Neitzke G: Confidentiality, secrecy, and privacy in ethics consultation. HEC Forum 19,4:293-302 (2007).

Evaluation research

  1. Neitzke G, Riedel A, Dinges S, Fahr U, May AT: Empfehlungen zur Evaluation von Ethikberatung in Einrichtungen des Gesundheitswesens. Ethik Med 25,2:149-156 (2013).
  2. Neitzke G: Ethische Konflikte im Klinikalltag – Ergebnisse einer empirischen Studie.. In: Stutzki R, Ohnsorge K, Reiter-Theil S (Eds): Ethikkonsultation heute – vom Modell zur Praxis. Lit-Verlag, Wien 2011 pp.59-80.

Patient/family participation

  1. Neitzke G, Sander K: Aufgabe und Funktion von Patientenvertretern in der Klinischen Ethikberatung. In: Groß D, May AT, Simon A (Eds): Beiträge zur Klinischen Ethikberatung an Universitätskliniken. Lit-Verlag, Münster 2008 pp.121-133.

Quality criteria of CES

  1. Neitzke G, Riedel A, Brombacher L, Heinemann W, Herrmann B: Empfehlungen zur Erstellung von Ethik-Leitlinien in Einrichtungen des Gesundheitswesens. AG „Ethikberatung im Gesundheitswesen“ in der Akademie für Ethik in der Medizin e.V. (AEM). Ethik Med 27,3:241-248 (2015).

 

 

Pedersen, Reidar

  1. Lillemoen L, Syse I, Pedersen R, Førde R: Er kliniske etikk-komiteer i den kommunale helse- og omsorgstjenesten bærekraftige?[Are ethics committees in municipal health care services sustainable?] Etikk i praksis 2:127-140 (2016).
  2. Magelssen M, Gjerberg E, Lillemoen L, Førde R, Pedersen R: Ethics support in community care makes a difference for practice. Nursing Ethics 25,2:165-173 (2018).
  3. Magelssen M, Pedersen R, Førde R: Four Roles of Ethical Theory in Clinical Ethics Consultation. American Journal of Bioethics 16,9:26-33 (2016).
  4. Molewijk AC, Stokke I, Pedersen R: Two years of moral case deliberations on the use of coercion in mental health care: Which ethical challenges are being discussed by health care professionals? Clinical Ethics 11,2-3:87-96 (2016).
  5. Syse, I, Førde R, Pedersen R: Clinical ethics committees – also for mental health care? The Norwegian experience. Clinical Ethics 11,2-3:81-86 (2016).
  6. Molewijk AC, Hem MH, Pedersen R: Dealing with ethical challenges: A focus group study with professionals in mental health care. BMC Medical Ethics 16,1:4 (2015).
  7. Hem MH, Pedersen R, Norvoll R, Molewijk AC: Evaluating clinical ethics support in mental healthcare: A systematic literature review. Nursing Ethics 22,4:452-466 (2015).
  8. Lillemoen L, Pedersen R: Ethics reflection groups in community health services: an evaluation study. BMC Medical Ethics 16:25 (2015).
  9. Magelssen M, Pedersen R, Førde R: Novel Paths to Relevance: How Clinical Ethics Committees Promote Ethical Reflection. HEC Forum 28,3:205-216 (2016).
  10. Magelssen M, Pedersen R, Førde R: Sources of bias in clinical ethics case deliberation. Journal of Medical Ethics 40,10:678-682 (2014).
  11. Svantesson M, Karlsson J, Boitte P, Schildman J, Dauwerse L, Widdershoven G, Pedersen R, Huisman M, Molewijk AC: Outcomes of Moral Case Deliberation – The development of an evaluation instrument for clinical ethics support (the Euro-MCD). BMC Medical Ethics 8,15:30 (2014).
  12. Gjerberg E, Lillemoen L, Dreyer A, Pedersen R, Førde R: Etisk kompetanseheving i norske kommuner-hva er gjort, og hva har vært levedyktig over tid? [Ethics work in Norwegian municipalities] Etikk i praksis 8,2:31-49 (2014).
  13. Lillemoen L, Pedersen R: Ethical challenges and how to develop ethics support in primary health care. Nursing Ethics 20,1:96-108 (2013).
  14. Lillemoen L, Pedersen R: Ethics in Municipal Health Services – Working Systematically with Ethics and Developing Competence in Ethics. Clinical Ethics 8,1:19-28 (2013).
  15. Førde R, Pedersen R: Evaluation of case consultations in clinical ethics committees. Clinical Ethics 7,1:45-50 (2012).
  16. Førde R, Pedersen R: Clinical ethics committees in Norway – what do they do, and does it make a difference? Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 20,3:389-395 (2011).
  17. Førde R, Pedersen R: Klinische Ethikkonsultation – ein landesweites Angebot in norwegischen Hospitälern. In: Stutzki R, Ohnsorge K, Reiter-Theil S: Ethikkonsultation heute – vom Modell zur Praxis. LIT Verlag 2011 pp. 303-315.
  18. Kalager G, Førde R, Pedersen R: Er drøftingen av pasientsaker i kliniske etikk-komiteer nyttig? [Are deliberations of patient cases in clinical ethics committees useful?] Tidsskrift for Den norske legeforening 131:118-121 (2011).
  19. Pedersen R, Akre V, Førde R: Barriers and Challenges in Clinical Ethics Consultations: The Experiences of Nine Clinical Ethics Committees. Bioethics 23,8:460-469 (2009).
  20. Pedersen R, Akre V, Førde R: What is happening during case deliberations in clinical ethics committees? A pilot study. Journal of Medical Ethics 35,4:147-152 (2009).
  21. Pedersen R, Førde R: Fuzzy Law Encountering Life, Death, and Morality: A Report on Nine Clinical Ethics Committees’ Legal Considerations. In: Gunning J, Holm S, Kenway I (Eds.): Ethics, Law and Society Volume IV. Ashgate 2009 pp. 149-163.
  22. Bollig G, Pedersen R, Førde R: Etikk i sykehjem og hjemmetjenester. [Ethics in nursing homes and home care services] Sykepleien Forskning 4,03:186-196 (2009).
  23. Førde R, Pedersen R, Akre V: Clinicians’ evaluation of clinical ethics consultations in Norway: a qualitative study. Medicine, Health care and Philosophy 11:17-25 (2008).
  24. Pedersen R, Førde R: Hva gjør de kliniske etikkomiteene? [What are the clinical ethics comittees doing?] Tidsskrift for Den norske legeforening 125,22: 3127-3129 (2005).

 

 

Reiter-Theil, Stella

  1. Reiter-Theil S: Initiating and Maintaining Clinical Ethics Support in Psychiatry. Ten Tasks and Challenges – and How to Meet Them. Clinical Ethics 11,2-3:45-53 (2016).
  2. Meyer D, Reiter-Theil S: Context-adjusted clinical ethics support (CES) in psychiatry. Accompanying a team through a sensitive period. Clinical Ethics 11,2-3:70-80 (2016).
  3. Reiter-Theil S, Schürmann J: The ‘Big Five’ in 100 Clinical Ethics Consultation Cases. Evaluating three years of ethics support in the Basel University Hospitals. Bioethica Forum 9,2:12-22 (2016).
  4. Reiter-Theil S, Schürmann J: Unterstützung bei ethischen Fragen – eine methodische Orientierung zur Ethikberatung in der Palliativversorgung. In: Wienke A, Janke K, Sitte T, Graf-Baumann T (Eds): Aktuelle Rechtsfragen der Palliativversorgung. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg 2016 pp. 35-47.
  5. Reiter-Theil S, Schürmann J: Evaluating clinical ethics support: on what grounds do we make judgments about reports of ethics consultation? In: Finder S, Bliton M, Mark J (Eds): Peer review, Peer Education, and Modeling in the Practice of Clinical Ethics Consultation: The Zadeh Project. Springer 2018 pp. 165-178.
  6. Reiter-Theil S, Schürmann J, Schmeck K: Klinische Ethik in der Psychiatrie: State of the Art. Psychiat Praxis 41,07:355-363 (2014).
  7. Rabenschlag F, Steinauer R, Heimann R, Reiter-Theil S: Wahrnehmung ethischer Aspekte in der psychiatrischen Patientenverso Ergebnisse einer Mitarbeiterumfrage. Psychiatrische Praxis 41,7:376-378 (2014).
  8. Stutzki R, Weber M, Reiter-Theil S: Finding their voices again – A media project offers a floor for vulnerable patients, clients and the socially deprived. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy. Med Health Care Philos 16,4:739-750 (2013).
  9. Medau I, Jox R, Reiter-Theil S: Error management in psychotherapy in the light of ethical principles. An interview study. BMC Medical Ethics 14,1:50 (2013)
  10. Medau I, Jox R, Dittmann V, Reiter-Theil S: Eine Pilotstudie zum Umgang mit Fehlern in der Psychotherapie – Therapeuten berichten aus der Praxis. Psychiat Prax 39: 326-331(2012).
  11. Reiter-Theil S, Mertz M, Schürmann J, Stingelin-Giles N, Meyer-Zehnder B: Evidence – Competence – Discourse. The Theoretical Framework of the Multi-centre Clinical Ethics Support Project METAP. Bioethics 25,7:403-412 (2011).
  12. Hurst SA, Reiter-Theil S, Slowther A, Pegoraro R, Foerde R, Danis M: Soll Ethikkonsultation Ärzten beim Umgang mit Ressourcen helfen? In: Stutzki R, Ohnsorge K, Reiter-Theil S (Eds.): Ethikkonsultation heute – vom Modell zur Praxis, LIT Verlag, Münster 2011 pp. 281-300.
  13. Reiter-Theil S: Das Ausbalancieren der Perspektiven oder: (Wie) Kann und soll man Patienten und Angehörige in die Ethikberatung einbeziehen? In: Stutzki R, Ohnsorge K, Reiter-Theil S (Eds): Ethikkonsultation heute – vom Modell zur Praxis, LIT Verlag, Münster 2011 pp. 169-184.
  14. Reiter-Theil S: Normativ-ethische Reflexion von Rollen und Tätigkeiten in der Ethikberatung – ein integratives Modell. In: Stutzki R, Ohnsorge K, Reiter-Theil S (Eds.): Ethikkonsultation heute – vom Modell zur Praxis, LIT Verlag, Münster 2011pp. 119-130.
  15. Stutzki R, Ohnsorge K, Reiter-Theil S (Eds.): Ethikkonsultation heute – vom Modell zur Praxis. LIT Verlag, Münster 2011.
  16. Reiter-Theil S: Dealing with the normative dimension in clinical ethics consultation. Cambridge Quarterly Healthcare Ethics 18,4:347-346 (2009).
  17. Pfäfflin M, Kobert K, Reiter-Theil S: Evaluating Clinical Ethics Consultation. Cambridge Quarterly Healthcare Ethics 18,4:406-419 (2009).
  18. Reiter-Theil S: Hilfe in ethischen Entscheidungskonflikten: Basiswissen zur Ethikberatung in der Klinik. In: Salomon F (Ed.): Praxisbuch Ethik in der Intensivmedizin. Medizinisch Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft 2009 pp. 41-50.
  19. Hurst S, Reiter-Theil S, Slowther A, Pegoraro R, Forde R, Danis M: Should ethics consultants help clinicians face scarcity of resources? Journal of Medical Ethics 34: 241-246 (2008).
  20. Hurst S, Reiter-Theil S, Baumann-Hölzle R, Foppa C, Malacrida R, Bosshard G, Salathé M, Mauron A: Growth of clinical ethics in a multilingual country: challenges and opportunities. Bioethica Forum 1,1:15-24 (2008).
  21. Kobert K, Pfäfflin M, Reiter-Theil S: Evaluation des klinischen Ethik-Beratungsdienstes. Hintergrund, Konzepte und Strategie im Ev. Krankenhaus Bielefeld. Ethik Med 20:122-133 (2008).
  22. Reiter-Theil S: Ethikberatung in der Klinik: ein integratives Modell für die Praxis und ihre Reflexion. Therapeutische Umschau 65:359-365 (2008).
  23. Hurst S, Reiter-Theil S, Slowther A, Pegoraro R, Forde R, Danis M: Physicians’ access to ethics support services in four European countries. Health Care Analysis 15,4:321-335 (2007).
  24. Reiter-Theil S: Klinische Ethikkonsultation: Grundlagen zur Einführung einer interdisziplinären Form der Beratung. In: Riha O, Nartschik C, Helm S (Eds): Schriftenreihe des Instituts für Ethik in der Medizin Leipzig e.V., Shaker Verlag, Aachen 2006, Band 8, pp. 38-59.
  25. Bartels S, Parker M, Hope T, Reiter-Theil S: Wie hilfreich sind “ethische Richtlinien” am Einzelfall? Eine vergleichende kasuistische Analyse der Deutschen Grundsätze, Britischen Guidelines und Schweizerischen Richtlinien zur Sterbebegleitung. Ethik Med 17,3:191-205 (2005).
  26. Reiter-Theil S: Klinische Ethikkonsultation – eine methodische Orientierung zur ethischen Beratung am Krankenbett. Schweizerische Ärztezeitung 86,6:436-351 (2005).
  27. Reiter-Theil S: Balancing the Perspectives. The Patient’s Role in Clinical Ethics Consultation. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 6:247-254 (2003).
  28. Reiter-Theil S: The Freiburg approach of ethics consultation. Process, outcome and competencies. Journal of Medical Ethics 27:121-123 (2001).
  29. Reiter-Theil S: Ethics consultation in Germany. The present situation. Health Ethics Committee Forum 13,3:265-280 (2001).
  30. Reiter-Theil S: Ethics consultation on demand. Concepts, practical experiences and a case study. Journal of Medical Ethics 26:198-203 (2000).
  31. Reiter-Theil S: Ethik in der Klinik – Theorie für die Praxis: Ziele, Aufgaben und Möglichkeiten des Ethik-Konsils. Ethik Med 11,4:222-232 (1999).
  32. Reiter-Theil S: The Role of Ethics Codes in Medicine: How Can They be Helpful in Making Decisions? In: Hildt E, Graumann S (Eds.): Genetics in Human Reproduction, Ashgate, Aldershot 1999 pp. 299-310.
  33. Reiter-Theil S: Anwendung ethischer Prinzipien bei der Begutachtung am Beispiel der Lebendspende. In: Dierks C, Neuhaus P, Wienke A (Eds.): Die Allokation von Spenderorganen. Rechtliche Aspekte. Schriftenreihe Medizinrecht, Springer, Heidelberg 1999 pp. 23-34.
  34. Reiter-Theil S: Kompetenz durch Ethik-Konsultation: ein Modell – dargestellt am Problem der Sterilisation einer geistig behinderten Frau. Systeme 12:1-15 (1998).
  35. Höger C, Reiter-Theil S, Reiter L, Derichs G, Kastner-Voigt M, Schulz T: Fallbezogene ethische Reflexion. Ein Prozessmodell zur Ethik-Konsultation in der Kin derpsychiatrie und Psychotherapie. System Familie 10:174-179 (1997).

 

Edition of Thematic Issues

  1. Reiter-Theil S, Dittmann V: Themenschwerpunkt „Ethische Unterstützung in der Psychiatrischen Klinik: Fragestellungen – Konzepte – Erfahrungen.“ Psychiatrische Praxis 41,7 (2014).
  2. Agich GJ, Reiter-Theil S: Special Issue “Clinical Ethics Consultation”. Cambridge Quarterly of Health Care Ethics 18,4 (2009).
  3. Reiter-Theil S, Agich GJ: Thematic Section “Research on Clinical Ethics and Consultation”. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 11,1(2008).
  4. Reiter-Theil S, Illhardt FJ: Ethik-Beratung in der Medizin. Ethik Med 11,4 (1999).

 

 

Schildmann Jan

Books

  1. Schildmann J, Gordon JS, Vollmann J (Eds): Clinical Ethics Consultation. Theories and Methods, Implementation, Evaluation. Ashgate, Farnham 2010.
  2. Vollmann J, Schildmann J, Simon A (Eds): Klinische Ethik. Aktuelle Entwicklungen in Theorie und Praxis. Campus, Frankfurt/Main 2009.

Articles

  1. Schildmann J, Nadolny S, Wäscher S, Gysels M, Vollmann J, Bausewein C: Clinical ethics support services (CESS) as complex intervention. Preliminary findings of a conceptual analysis and possible implications for outcomes research. Bioethica Forum 9,2:90-92 (2016).
  2.  Molewijk B, Slowther A, Schildmann J: The European Clinical Ethics Network (ECEN): the professional development of clinical ethics support in Europe and the importance of quality assessment through evaluation research Bioethica Forum 9:86-89 (2016).
  3. Schildmann J, Vollmann J: Evaluation of clinical ethics consultation: A systematic review and critical appraisal of research methods and outcome criteria. In: Schildmann J, Gordon J, Vollmann J (Eds): Clinical Ethics Consultation: theories – methods – evaluation. Ashgate Publishers, Farnham 2010 pp. 203-215.

 

 

Spranzi, Marta

Clinical ethics consultation

  1. Spranzi M: Professionalizing the practice of clinical ethics consultation: Problems and perspectives. Bioethica Forum 9,2:31-33 (2016).
  2. Spranzi M, Fournier V, Brunet L, Foureur N: The ‘commitment model’ for clinical ethics consultations: society’s involvement in the solution of individual cases. The Journal of Clinical Ethics 26,4:286-296 (2015).

Clinical ethics

  1. Spranzi M: When patients’ values challenge professional integrity. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 59,3:326-336 (2016).
  2. Fournier V, Belghiti E, Brunet L, Spranzi M: Withdrawal of artificial nutrition and hydration in neonatal intensive care: parents’ and healthcare practitioners’ views. Med Health Care Philos 20,3:365-371 (2017).
  3. Spranzi M: La place des parents dans la décision de limitation, d’arrêt ou de poursuite des traitements actifs en néonatologie. In: Bétrémieux P (Ed): La démarche palliative en médecine périnatale. Olo Editions.
  4. Spranzi M: Professional integrity. In: ten Haven H (Ed)  Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics, Springer 2016.
  5. Fournier V, Spranzi M: The near-failure of advance directives: why they should not be abandoned altogether, but their role radically reconsidered. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 19,4:563-568 (2016).
  6. Spranzi M: The French euthanasia debate: Exception and solidarity. The Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 22:1-9 (2013).
  7. Spranzi M: Clinical ethics and values: how do norms evolve from practice? The Journal of Medicine, Healthcare and Philosophy 16,1:93-103 (2013).
  8. Spranzi M: The normative relevance of cases: Rhetoric and empirical ethics. The Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 21,4:481-492 (2012).
  9. Fournier V, Spranzi M: L’autonomie en question: pratique éthique et enjeux politiques. Raison publique 5:217-242 (2011).

 

 

Vollmann, Jochen

Books

  1. Dörries A, Neitzke G, Simon A, Vollmann J (Eds): Klinische Ethikberatung. Ein Praxisbuch für Krankenhäuser und Einrichtungen der Altenpflege. Zweite überarbeitete und erweiterte Auflage. Kohlhammer, Stuttgart 2010.
  2. Schildmann J, Gordon JS, Vollmann J (Eds): Clinical Ethics Consultation. Theories and Methods, Implementation, Evaluation. Ashgate Publichers, Farnham 2010.
  3. Vollmann J, Schildmann J, Simon A (Eds): Klinische Ethik. Aktuelle Entwicklungen in Theorie und Praxis. Campus, Frankfurt/Main 2009.

Articles

  1. Schildmann J, Nadolny S, Wäscher S, Gysels M, Vollmann J, Bausewein C: Clinical ethics support services (CESS) as complex intervention. Preliminary findings of a conceptual analysis and possible implications for outcomes research. Bioethica Forum 2:90-92 (2016).
  2. Gather J, Vollmann J: Klinische Ethikberatung – ein Modell für die Psychiatrie? Psyche im Fokus 1:38-40 (2015).
  3. Dörries A, Simon A, Vollmann J Neitzke G: The impact of an ethics training programme on the success of clinical ethics services. Clinical Ethics 9:36-44 (2014).
  4. Vollmann J: The implementation process of clinical ethics consultation: concepts, resistance, recommendations. Revista Română de Bioetică, 11,3:108-122 (2013).
  5. Dörries A, Neitzke G, Simon A, Vollmann J: Implementing Clinical Ethics in German Hospitals: Content, Didactics and Evaluation of a Nationwide Postgraduate Training Programme. Journal of Medical Ethics 36:721-726 (2010).
  6. Vollmann J: Klinik: Aufgaben und Kriterien für Klinische Ethikkomitees. Bundesgesundheitsblatt 51:865-871 (2008).
  7. Vollmann J: Klinische Ethikkomitees und Ethikberatung in Deutschland: Bisherige Entwicklung und zukünftige Perspektiven. Bioethica Forum 1,1:33-39 (2008).
  8. Vollmann J: Klinische Ethikkomitees und klinische Ethikberatung im Krankenhaus. Ein Praxisleitfaden über Strukturen, Aufgaben, Modelle und Implementierungsschritte. Medizinethische Materialien Bochum 164, 9ed. (2007).
  9. Vollmann J: Ethik in der klinischen Medizin. Bestandsaufnahme und Ausblick. Ethik in der Medizin 18:348-352 (2006).
  10. Wernstedt T, Vollmann J: Das Erlanger klinische Ethikkomitee. Organisationsethik an einem deutschen Universitätsklinikum. Ethik in der Medizin 17:44-51 (2005).
  11. Vollmann J: Klinische Ethikkomitees und Ethikberatung in Deutschland. Zeitschrift für Palliativmedizin 6:2-5 (2005).
  12. Dörries A, Simon A, Neitzke G, Vollmann J: Ethikberatung im Krankenhaus: Qualifizierungsprogramm Hannover. Ethik in der Medizin 17:327-331 (2005).
  13. Vollmann J, Wank M, Weidtmann A, Reinhardt FM: What did she “really” want? (Kasuistik) Intensive Care Medicine 30:733 (2004).
  14. Vollmann J, Burchardi N, Weidtmann A: Klinische Ethikkomitees an deutschen Universitätskliniken. Eine Befragung aller Ärztlichen Direktoren und Pflegedirektoren. Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift 129:1237-1242 (2004).
  15. Vollmann J: Implementing clinical ethics in health care institutions: The Nijmegen model. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 7:223-225 (2004).
  16. Vollmann J, Weidtmann A: Das Klinische Ethikkomitee des Erlanger Universitätsklinikums: Institutionalisierung-Arbeitsweise-Perspektiven. Ethik in der Medizin 15:229-238 (2003).
  17. Vollmann J: Effekte klinischer Ethikberatung auf amerikanischen Intensivstationen. (Kommentar) Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift 128:2409 (2003).
  18. Vollmann J: Ethikberatung. Ist die Ethikberatung im amerikanischen Krankenhaus ein Modell für Deutschland? Zeitschrift für Allgemeinmedizin 73:137-138 (1997).
  19. Vollmann J: Der klinische Ethiker – ein Konzept mit Zukunft? Zur Integration von philosophischer Ethik in die praktische Medizin. Ethik in der Medizin 7:181-192 (1995).